Please login with your free MJA account to view this article in full
Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.
- 1 Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, WA
- 2 Bunbury Regional Hospital, Bunbury, WA
- 3 South West Health Campus, Bunbury, WA
- 4 University of Western Australia, Perth, WA
No relevant disclosures.
- 1. Barrit DW, Jordan SC. Anticoagulant drugs in the treatment of pulmonary embolism: a controlled trial. Lancet 1960; 1: 1309-1312.
- 2. Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Investigators. Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Study: final results. Circulation 1991; 84: 527-539.
- 3. Ansell J, Hirsh J, Hylek E, et al. Pharmacology and management of the vitamin K antagonists: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th edition). Chest 2008; 133: 60S-198S.
- 4. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australia’s health 2016 (AIHW Cat. No. AUS 199; Australia’s Health Series No. 15). Canberra: AIHW, 2016.
- 5. Laurence C, Gialamas A, Yelland L, et al. Point of Care Testing in General Practice Trial: final report. Jan 2009. http://www.appn.net.au/Data/Sites/1/SharedFiles/Publications/200901-poctfinalreport27jan09amended5feb09.pdf (viewed Dec 2016).
- 6. Peterson GM, Boom K, Jackson SL, Vial JH. Doctors’ beliefs on the use of antithrombotic therapy in atrial fibrillation: identifying barriers to stroke prevention. Intern Med J 2002; 32: 15-23.
- 7. Hicks T, Stewart F, Eisinga A. NOACs versus warfarin for stroke prevention in patients with AF: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Open Heart 2016; 3: e000279.
- 8. Van Es N, Coppens M, Schulman S, et al. Direct oral anticoagulants compared with vitamin K antagonists for acute venous thromboembolism: evidence from phase 3 trials. Blood 2014; 124: 1968-1975.
- 9. Bauer KA. Pros and cons of new oral anticoagulants. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 2013; 2013: 464-470.
- 10. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Rural regional and remote health: a guide to remoteness classifications (AIHW Cat. No. PHE 53). Canberra: AIHW, 2004. Archived: https://web.archive.org/web/20170712025537/http://www.aihw.gov.au/publication-detail/?id=6442467589 (viewed Dec 2016).
- 11. Lip GY, Frison L, Halperin JL, Lane DA. Comparative validation of a novel risk score for predicting bleeding risk in anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation: the HAS-BLED (Hypertension, Abnormal Renal/Liver Function, Stroke, Bleeding History or Predisposition, Labile INR, Elderly, Drugs/Alcohol Concomitantly) score. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 57: 173-180.
- 12. Lip GY, Nieuwlaat R, Pisters R, et al. Refining clinical risk stratification for predicting stroke and thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation using a novel risk factor-based approach: the Euro Heart Survey on Atrial Fibrillation. Chest 2010; 137: 263-272.
- 13. Kaatz S, Ahmad D, Spyropoulos AC, et al. Definition of clinically relevant non-major bleeding in studies of anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolic disease in non-surgical patients: communication from the SSC of the ISTH. J Thromb Haemost 2015; 13: 2119-2126.
- 14. Schulman S, Kearon C. Definition of major bleeding in clinical investigations of antihemostatic medicinal products in non-surgical patients. J Thromb Haemost 2005; 3: 692-694.
- 15. Kirchhof P, Benussi S, Kotecha D, et al. 2016 ESC guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS. Eur Heart J 2016; 37: 2893-2962.
- 16. Jordan S, Wilson A, Dobson A. Management of heart conditions in older rural and urban Australian women. Intern Med J 2011; 41: 722-729.
- 17. Wong CX, Lee SW, Gan SW, et al. Underuse and overuse of anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation: a study in Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians. Int J Cardiol 2015; 191: 20-24.
- 18. Själander S, Själander A, Svensson PJ, Friberg L. Atrial fibrillation patients do not benefit from acetylsalicylic acid. Europace 2014; 16: 631-638.
- 19. Flaker GC, McGowan DJ, Boechler M, et al. Underutilization of antithrombotic therapy in elderly rural patients with atrial fibrillation. Am Hear J 1999; 137: 307-312.
- 20. Avgil Tsadok M, Jackevicius CA, Essebag V, et al. Warfarin treatment and outcomes of patients with atrial fibrillation in rural and urban settings. J Rural Health 2015; 31: 310-315.
- 21. Pong RW, DesMeules M, Lagacé C. Rural-urban disparities in health: How does Canada fare and how does Canada compare with Australia? Aust J Rural Health 2009; 17: 58-64.
- 22. Newbury J, Kleinig T, Leyden J, et al. Stroke Epidemiology in an Australian Rural Cohort (SEARCH). Int J Stroke 2017; 12: 161-168.
- 23. Roldán V, Marín F, Manzano-Fernández S, et al. The HAS-BLED Score has better prediction accuracy for major bleeding than CHADS2 or CHA2DS2–VASc Scores in anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 62: 2199-2204.
- 24. Pratt NL, Ramsay EN, Caughey GE, et al. Uptake of novel oral anticoagulants in Australia. Med J Aust 2016; 204: 104-105. <MJA full text>
- 25. Papakonstantinou PE, Asimakopoulou NI, Gargeraki A, et al. Anticoagulation management in non-valvular atrial fibrillation in rural and remote Crete. A single-center study from the region of Sitia. Hellenic J Cardiol 2016; 57: 279-281.


Abstract
Objective: To determine the use of different anticoagulation therapies in rural Western Australia; to establish whether remoteness from health care services affects the choice of anticoagulation therapy; to gather preliminary data on anticoagulation therapy safety and efficacy.
Design: Retrospective cohort study of patients hospitalised with a principal diagnosis of atrial fibrillation/flutter (AF) or venous thromboembolism (VTE) during 2014–2015.
Setting: Four hospitals serving two-thirds of the rural population of Western Australia.
Participants: 609 patients with an indication for anticoagulation therapy recorded in their hospital discharge summary for index admission.
Main outcome measures: Prescribing rates of anticoagulation therapies by indication for anticoagulation and distance of patient residence from their hospital. The primary safety outcome was re-hospitalisation with a major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding event; the primary lack-of-efficacy outcome was re-hospitalisation for a thromboembolic event.
Results: The overall rates of prescription of NOACs and warfarin were similar (34% v 33%). A NOAC was prescribed more often than warfarin for patients with AF (56.0% v 42.2% of those who received an anticoagulant; P < 0.001), but less often for patients with VTE (29% v 48%; P < 0.001). Warfarin was prescribed for 38% of patients who lived locally, a NOAC for 31% (P = 0.013); for non-local patients, the respective proportions were 29% and 36% (P = 0.08). 69% of patients with AF and a CHA2DS2–VASc score ≥ 1 were prescribed anticoagulation therapy. Patients treated with NOACs had fewer bleeding events than patients treated with warfarin (nine events [4%] v 20 events [10%]; P = 0.027).
Conclusions: In rural WA, about one-third of patients with an indication for anticoagulation therapy receive NOACs, but one-third of patients with AF and at risk of stroke received no anticoagulant therapy, and may benefit from NOAC therapy.