Topics

Anatomy and physiology

Anatomy and physiology Perspective 18 August 2025 Open Access

Lung cancer biobanking in Australia: challenges and future directions

Overview of lung cancer biobanking globally and in Australia, challenges such as difficulty with tissue acquisition, the usefulness of biospecimens in multi-omic analysis, as well as unique challenges faced in Australia

Sarah Yeo · Stephen Q Wong · Farzaneh Atashrazm · Andreas Behren · Anthony T Papenfuss · Natalia Vukelic · Lisa Briggs · Ashleigh R Poh · Daniel Steinfort · Natasha Smallwood · Kate Sutherland · Vivek Naranbhai · Sagun Parakh · Tracy Leong

Indigenous health Research 3 March 2025 Open Access

Improving cardiometabolic risk factors in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in northeast Arnhem Land: single arm trial of a co‐designed dietary and lifestyle program

Culturally acceptable strategies for improving risk factors could reduce cardiometabolic disease in remote Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities

Hasthi UW Dissanayake · George Gurruwiwi · J Dhurrkay · Josh C Tynan · Sabine Braat · Benjamin Harrap · Tim Trudgen · Sarah Hanieh · Bronwyn Clark · Michaela Spencer · Michael Christie · Emma Tonkin · Emily Armstrong · Leonard C Harrison · John M Wentworth · Julie K Brimblecombe · Beverley‐Ann Biggs

Mja2 52593

Paracoccidioidomycosis: an Australian case

A 34-year-old man, born in Brasília, Brazil, who had been living in Australia for three years with no return travel, presented to his dentist with an eight-week history of a painful, progressively enlarging maxillary, gingival ulcerative lesion

Timothy C Badrick · Ella M Meumann · Kathryn Shirley · Peter Simos · Mertya L May · Gary Quagliotto · Evan C Bursle · Nici Leonard · Rodney J McDougall · Jennifer M Robson

Mja2 52300
Respiratory disease Research 3 June 2024 Open Access

Which reference equation should we use for interpreting spirometry values for First Nations Australians? A cross‐sectional study

The normal spirometry values of healthy First Nations Australians may be substantially higher than previously reported

Andrew J Collaro · Rachel Foong · Anne B Chang · Julie M Marchant · Tamara L Blake · Johanna F Cole · Glenn Pearson · Rebecca Hii · Henry Brown · Mark D Chatfield · Graham Hall · Margaret S McElrea

Ethics Letters 3 October 2022 Free

Skeletons in the closet: time to give human bones acquired by health practitioners for educational purposes the respect they deserve

To the Editor: The concepts presented by Coman and colleagues1 parallel international trends within anatomical societies, where attitudes on human remains used for educational purposes are under scrutiny.2 Illuminating issues around legacy collections, and pressing for further clarity, transparency and appropriate cultural and ethical solutions, is important for the proper treatment of these precious resources. It is also necessary given recent events that have raised concerns within the public about how human remains and anatomical collections are treated under the guise of education.3 We strongly support the points made by Coman et al around development of repatriation policies for privately held bones, but we respectfully suggest additional considerations. The suggestion “Medical ethicists assert that in the absence of consent, anatomical specimens … should be destroyed”1 is not congruent with current suggestions and practice.4 Anatomical collections that have no provenance or consent are often used as teaching resources and represent the tangible legacies of histories of this field of science. As such, they serve the additional educational purpose of eliciting discussions on contemporary ethical and professional practice.5 There are also benefits associated with using real bones as opposed to three‐dimensional or plastic copies that do not retain the same weight, detail or nuanced anatomical features. Arguments do exist for disposition of unconsented collections, but these should be considered against the educational value these remains deliver and the social, ethical and cultural concerns around their ongoing use. In proposing consultation across various groups to clarify appropriate practice around “managing the legacy of human bone use in education,“1 we suggest it is necessary to include other specific interest groups to ensure community‐appropriate practices are developed. It is essential that community input is acquired, with indigenous representatives contributing knowledge and perspective. In addition, input from organisations that contribute expertise specific to national and international standards and practice are necessary. This should include local organisations, the Australian Institute of Anatomical Sciences and the Australian and New Zealand Association of Clinical Anatomists, and globally, the International Federation of Associations of Anatomists ethics committee. Such broad input is necessary to ensure guidelines are fit for purpose in a global education community.

Jon Cornwall · Sabine Hildebrandt · Thomas Champney

Mja2 51704

Subscribe to MJA email alerts

No spam, you can unsubscribe anytime you want.

By providing your information, you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Thanks for Subscribing! Tell us more

Your email updates will use your name.

Good one! Your updates are coming

Thank you for subscribing to the MJA email alerts. Receive the latest content in your inbox.