Topics

Ethics

Ethics Perspective 29 July 2026 Open Access

Research Priority Setting Is Not Research: A Call for Ethical Clarity in Australia

In Australia, research priority setting (RPS) may be misclassified as research requiring ethics approval, despite its purpose as a collaborative, pre-research involvement activity. Treating RPS as research creates delays, diverts resources and undermines partnership principles central to inclusive, community-centred priority setting. Recent revisions to the National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research clarify that pre-research consultation does not require ethics review, creating an opportunity for consistent national practice. We call for institutions to recognise RPS as involvement and provide proportionate, non-ethics oversight to accelerate RPS and deliver more responsive research agendas that reduce waste.

Bec Jenkinson, Gordon McGurk, Jonathan Quicke, Janelle Bowden, Nadine E. Foster

Ethics Ethics and law 22 April 2026 Open Access

Organ Donation After Oral Ingestion of a Voluntary Assisted Dying Substance

Organ donation after voluntary assisted dying (VAD) is increasingly undertaken in jurisdictions where it is legally permissible, including Australia, although previously all reported cases involved intravenous administration of the life-ending substance. A 55-year-old woman in Victoria has become the first known person to have successfully donated organs and tissues after self-administration of an oral substance, despite initial uncertainty about feasibility due to the unpredictable time to death (agonal phase). With Victorian legislation requiring self-administration as the default, this case provides a precedent, opening the possibility of donation for others in this majority VAD cohort where oral administration is obligatory.

Joanne Kantianis, Helen I. Opdam, Rohit L. D'Costa

Ethics Ethics and law 14 January 2026 Free

Genomic Newborn Screening: Commodity or Public Good?

Genomic newborn screening (gNBS) can screen for a broad range of genetic conditions, potentially enabling early treatment and improving health outcomes. However, it remains outside publicly funded programmes due to limited evidence and substantial implementation challenges. Offering gNBS in the interim as a fee-for-service option in Australia risks creating inequitable healthcare access, fragmenting care and limiting control over genomic data. Conversely, prohibiting private access may unfairly deny potential benefits to individual infants and families. This article discusses the ethical and practical implications of offering gNBS on a fee-for-service basis prior to a decision being made regarding public funding. Although fee-for-service gNBS undermines equitable access, regulated private offerings by public genomics services could mitigate some of the risks. We emphasise the need for large-scale, well-designed research studies to inform the development and equitable implementation of robust gNBS programmes within public healthcare frameworks.

Christopher Gyngell, Sebastian Lunke, Danya Vears, Zornitza L. Stark

10 5694 mja2 70135
Sexual health Perspective 6 October 2025 Open Access

Cass Review does not guide care for trans young people

Good medicine is guided by the values of the patient, not those of a clinician, politician or commentator. The Cass Review, lacking expertise and compromised by implicit stigma and misinformation, does not give credible evidence-based guidance

Julia K Moore · Cate Rayner · S Rachel Skinner · Katie Wynne · Blake S Cavve · Brodie Fraser · Uma Ganti · Claire McAllister · Gideon Meyerowitz‐Katz · Tram Nguyen · Anja Ravine · Brian Ross · Darren B Russell · Liz A Saunders · Aris Siafarikas · Ken C Pang

Mja2 70035
Indigenous health Perspective 15 September 2025 Open Access

The contribution of evidence‐based practice and the practice‐based evidence approaches to contemporary Australian psychology: implications for culturally safe practice

Adopting a broader and more inclusive approach to evidence represents an important step toward addressing the persistent inequities experienced by many Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and diverse communities

Paul Gray (Wiradjuri) · Dawn Darlaston‐Jones · Pat Dudgeon AM (Bardi) · Kate Derry · Joanna Alexi · William Smith (Wiradjuri and Wemba Wemba) · Tanja Hirvonen (Jaru and Bunuba) · David Badcock · Shraddha Kashyap · Belle Selkirk (Noongar)

Mja2 70028
Ethics Ethics and law 14 April 2025 Open Access

Should self‐administered voluntary assisted dying be supervised? A Queensland case

ABC, a grieving older person, died after consuming a voluntary assisted dying (VAD) substance prescribed for their spouse. A Queensland coroner’s inquest recommended the law require self-administration to be medically supervised. This case highlights the tensions between facilitating access to VAD and community safety.

Eliana Close · Katrine Del Villar · Ben P White

Mja2 52634
Statistics Perspective 31 March 2025 Open Access

Dismantling barriers to research and clinical care for individuals with a vision impairment

Accessibility in research is an ongoing commitment that will continue to change based on the needs and preferences of the community. We must weigh up the impact of incorporating accessibility practices in research with the social cost of forgoing them

Eden G Robertson · Kate Hetherington · Meredith Prain · Julia Hall · Leighton Boyd AM · Rosemary Boyd OAM · Emily Shepard · Hollie Feller · Sally Karandrews · Fleur O'Hare · Kanae Yamamoto · Matthew P Simunovic · Robyn V Jamieson · Alan Ma · Lauren Ayton AM · Anai Gonzalez‐Cordero

Mja2 52627

Subscribe to MJA email alerts

No spam, you can unsubscribe anytime you want.

By providing your information, you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Thanks for Subscribing! Tell us more

Your email updates will use your name.

Good one! Your updates are coming

Thank you for subscribing to the MJA email alerts. Receive the latest content in your inbox.