Information science

On behalf of the entire editorial team, welcome to the new look MJA. Over the past 6 months, we have reviewed every aspect of our editorial process and production, all in an effort to provide you the reader and all prospective authors with the best possible experience that we can. We are excited to debut this new look issue with an Indigenous health theme and are grateful for the input of Guest Editor Professor Shane Houston for his valuable insights in this important field. Your journal is now divided into three distinct sections — blue, red and green. The blue section starts us off and contains important news, perspectives, debates, lessons from practice, clinical snapshots with an image, a new educational series, information on medical law and ethics, historical vignettes, and other articles that are of broad interest to all. For example, in this issue we are proud to launch our new clinical skills series that we hope will be of value not only to doctors in training and medical students but also to experienced clinicians. This year we will also commence a new series in innovations in medical education and a series to demystify research methodology and statistics. The red section follows, led by editorials usually linked to research articles, original research articles, and short research reports. Based on reader and author feedback, we have dispensed with only publishing summaries of research articles in print; instead we will publish research in full in the red section. A new feature included with original research articles will be a summary box highlighting the known, the new and the implications, to help guide readers to studies that they will want to read in detail. We will also publish excellent systematic reviews, meta-analyses, expert reviews and guidelines in the red section, and we strongly encourage their submission for consideration. A fresh letters to the editor section has been reinstated; the online response section has been retained. We are especially interested in letters that provide insights into research that we have published, as this is a key final part of the peer review process. Finally, the green section wraps up the content with careers and miscellaneous material of general interest. We welcome your feedback on the new format and other aspects of the Journal. All articles, including original research, reviews and perspectives, will continue to undergo multiple layers of rigorous review to ensure that we publish the best possible content. Initially, submitted articles are reviewed by an experienced medical editor, who will obtain a second medical editor opinion if needed. If the manuscript passes this stage, formal peer review is obtained and, if relevant, also a statistical review. The manuscript and reviewer comments are then discussed by the entire team of editors including, where applicable, an expert statistician at the manuscript review meeting, held twice weekly. If the manuscript passes this stage, it is returned to the authors for revision. We are working to streamline our processes so authors receive a more rapid decision while always maintaining our high standards. I am very pleased to announce that we have new MJA editorial advisory group (https://www.mja.com.au/journal/staff/mja-editorial-advisory-committee). The members include leading clinicians and academics from multiple fields, and a medical student representative. The advisory group has met with the editorial team twice now, and is providing guidance and input that we deeply value. You will notice that we have included prominent international colleagues from New Zealand, Hong Kong, the United Kingdom and Canada. This is consistent with the Journal’s interest in taking Australia’s best research to the world and bringing such research here for our readers, and expansion of international membership will be considered. Guest editors will also appear in the Journal to contribute to the development of themed issues and the teaching series. As well as doing all we can to look after our readership, we will continue to support our prospective authors in every possible way. We provide as much guidance as we can because we want to improve promising articles. Translation of research into practice is a priority for health and for this reason we will now offer a fast track process for clinical trial manuscripts. We will also streamline the publication of clinical guidelines and consensus statement manuscripts that have already been through a rigorous peer review process. Thank you to everyone who has published in the MJA since my tenure began in December 2015.1 Your work is deeply valued and I remain impressed by the very high quality of submissions we are seeing every day. We can only publish a fraction of what we receive but there are many advantages to publishing in the MJA.2 Along with the MJA being one of the world’s leading general medical journals (ranked among the top 20 globally in 2015), an obvious advantage is that there is no cost to authors but every original research article is immediately made available in full for free. This means that clinicians, policy makers and researchers can read and cite your work as soon as it is published. We believe important research should be widely accessible, with no barriers. By making your research available in this fashion, we are doing our part to support the advancement of medicine here and around the world. Please refer to the updated author guidelines on our website for all the information needed for submission (https://www.mja.com.au/journal/mja-instructions-authors). I would like to personally thank all our authors and readers, peer reviewers, new members of the editorial advisory group, and my team for your contributions to the MJA. Your support ensures that the proud tradition of the MJA continues.

Nicholas J Talley

The Eric Dark competition winner in the student category

Joash J Arnold MB BS

Medical television dramas exercise a growing influence on the practice of junior doctors

Hasan N Haboubi MB BS, BSc(Hons), MRCP · Holly Morgan MB BCh · Omar Aldalati MD, MRCP

It is not plausible that a researcher could author 50 or more publications a year and still adhere to the NHMRC authorship criteria

Anthony F Jorm PhD, DSc

How can we help our patients make sensible decisions?

Ian E Haines MB BS, FRACP, FAChPM

Patient care is compromised by GPs not understanding abbreviations used in hospital discharge letters

Mark Chemali MB BS, BPharm(Hons) · Emily J Hibbert MB BS(Hons), MClinEd, FRACP · Adrian Sheen MB BS, DipObstRACOG, FRACGP · Mark Chemali MB BS, BPharm(Hons) · Emily J Hibbert MB BS(Hons), MClinEd, FRACP · Adrian Sheen MB BS, DipObstRACOG, FRACGP

An expression of support for Bruce Hall and his significant contributions to the field of transplantation

Jeremy R Chapman · Geoffrey W McCaughan · Philip J O’Connell

Efforts to decolonise health care practice and research holds lessons for journalists and the media industry

Melissa A Sweet MA, BA · Patricia Dudgeon BAppSc, GradDip(Psych), PhD · Kerry McCallum PhD, BA · Matthew D Ricketson BA(Hons), MA, PhD

Is the “publish or perish” culture breeding dodgy journals seeking to make a profit?

Lileane Liang Xu · Anthony Minh Tien Chau

Because the body is vocal as it nears the end with its querulous list of aches and pains that makes relatives squeamish. Because the body doesn’t care; everything grumbles and complains. The ground has become perilous. Because our bowels are slow, the bladder stings and the body is a mulish obstinate thing, whose hipbones jut out beneath flaps of skin. Because our log-jammed senses no longer grasp the ...

Lisa Jacobson

The story of one woman’s journey through heartbreak to peace and acceptance.

Name withheld

A doctor gets to know the man of few words who has conveniently set up shop across the road from the hospital

Geoffrey C Mullins MB BS, FANZCA, FRCPC

GREAT SCIENCE is characterised by discovery and by finding solutions to real problems. Unlike physics, where a prediction based in theory leads to a search for supporting evidence, progress in biology depends more on systematic experimentation and observation than on any grand hypothesis. This is because biological systems have sequentially and adaptively evolved via mutations in the designer code of our genes. Without an overarching ...

Peter C Doherty

As the Journal approaches its 100th birthday, it has a new Editor-in-Chief and much to look forward to

Stephen R Leeder MD, PhD, FRACP

A young doctor, co-opted as a surgical assistant, learns a valuable lesson about life, death and generosity.

Nancy L Merridew BA, BSc, MB BS

Reporters need to balance real-world writing pressures against idealised reporting standards. When doctors and academics critique mainstream media health coverage, they typically suggest that this is to educate reporters about their failings, and/or to sound the alert generally about the media’s tendency to mislead a naive public into believing dangerous falsehoods about risks of disease, side effects of medicines, miracle cures and so on. The article by ...

Julie C Robotham MA