Connect
MJA
MJA

The MJA and Gawler: a case of self-censorship? Correction and clarification

Annette G Katelaris
Med J Aust 2012; 197 (2): . || doi: 10.5694/mja12.11051
Published online: 16 July 2012

Comment: In the 4 June issue of the Journal, I responded1 to an enquiry from McBryde2 as to why the Medical Journal of Australia decided not to publish an article by Haines and Lowenthal regarding the importance of a histological diagnosis when managing advanced cancer.


  • Medical Journal of Australia


Correspondence: akatelaris@mja.com.au

Competing interests:

No relevant disclosures.

  • 1. Katelaris AG. The MJA and Gawler: a case of self-censorship [letter]? Med J Aust 2012; 196: 628. doi: 10.5694/mja12.10806. <MJA full text>
  • 2. McBryde ES. The MJA and Gawler: a case of self-censorship [letter]? Med J Aust 2012; 196: 628. doi: 10.5694/mja12.10684. <MJA full text>

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.