Better performance metrics for the MJA

Dev A S Kevat
Med J Aust 2013; 199 (3): . || doi: 10.5694/mja13.10084
Published online: 5 August 2013

To the Editor: There is indeed a lot to “like” about the MJA in recent years,1 including a much-improved website, a defined space for the humanities, and the Journal’s courage in publishing articles that critique the performance of organisations and institutions.2-4

  • Dev A S Kevat1,2

  • 1 Nuffield Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.
  • 2 Department of Public Health, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC.


Competing interests:

I have acted as a peer reviewer for Annals of Internal Medicine.


remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.