Connect
MJA
MJA

Australia is responding to the complex challenge of overdiagnosis

Eugen Molodysky
Med J Aust 2019; 210 (11): . || doi: 10.5694/mja2.50203
Published online: 17 June 2019

To the Editor: Moynihan and colleagues1 make a good case for Australia responding to the complex challenge of reducing the overdiagnosis of clinical disease. However, this challenge should not lead to confusion with the early diagnosis of and the early intervention in preclinical disease, which are the mainstay of secondary prevention. While reducing diagnosis creep and expanding disease definitions are predominantly the realm of the specialist disciplines, primary care is uniquely placed to embrace preclinical disease diagnosis, increasing early detection and intervention, while specialists endorse reducing overdiagnosis, both collaborating in lowering long term costs to the health system.

  • Eugen Molodysky

  • University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW

Correspondence: molodysky@ozemail.com.au

Competing interests:

No relevant disclosures.

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Responses are now closed for this article.