Diagnosis and management of heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia: a consensus statement from the Thrombosis and Haemostasis Society of Australia and New Zealand HIT Writing Group

Joanne Joseph, David Rabbolini, Anoop K Enjeti, Emmanuel Favaloro, Marie‐Christine Kopp, Simon McRae, Leonardo Pasalic, Chee Wee Tan, Christopher M Ward and Beng H Chong
Med J Aust 2019; 210 (11): . || doi: 10.5694/mja2.50213
Published online: 17 June 2019


Introduction: Heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a prothrombotic disorder that occurs following the administration of heparin and is caused by antibodies to platelet factor 4 and heparin. Diagnosis of HIT is essential to guide treatment strategies using non‐heparin anticoagulants and to avoid unwanted and potential fatal thromboembolic complications. This consensus statement, formulated by members of the Thrombosis and Haemostasis Society of Australia and New Zealand, provides an update on HIT pathogenesis and guidance on the diagnosis and management of patients with suspected or confirmed HIT.

Main recommendations:

  • A 4Ts score is recommended for all patients with suspected HIT prior to laboratory testing.
  • Further laboratory testing with a screening immunoassay or confirmatory functional assay is not recommended in individuals with a low 4Ts score. However, if there are missing or unreliable clinical data, then laboratory testing should be performed.
  • A positive functional assay result confirms the diagnosis of HIT and should be performed to confirm a positive immunoassay result.
  • Heparin exposure must be ceased in patients with suspected or confirmed HIT and initial treatment with a non‐heparin alternative instituted.
  • Non‐heparin anticoagulants (danaparoid, argatroban, fondaparinux and bivalirudin) used to treat HIT should be given in therapeutic rather than prophylactic doses.
  • Direct oral anticoagulants may be used in place of warfarin after patients with HIT have responded to alternative parenteral anticoagulants with platelet count recovery.


Changes in management as a result of this statement:

  • These are the first Australasian recommendations for diagnosis and management of HIT, with a focus on locally available diagnostic assays and therapeutic options.
  • The importance of examining both clinical and laboratory data in considering a diagnosis of HIT cannot be overstated.


  • 1 St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, NSW
  • 2 St Vincent's Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW
  • 3 Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW
  • 4 Northern Blood Research Centre, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, NSW
  • 5 Calvary Mater Hospital, Sydney, NSW
  • 6 Institute of Clinical Pathology and Medical Research, Sydney, NSW
  • 7 Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW
  • 8 Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA
  • 9 St George Hospital, Sydney, NSW


Competing interests:

Anoop Enjeti has received speaker fees from Bayer and Sanofi Aventis outside the submitted work. Simon McRae has received research funding from CSL and Roche outside the submitted work. Chee Wee Tan has received non‐financial support from Bayer Health and speaker fees from Pfizer outside the submitted work. Christopher Ward has received personal fees and non‐financial support from Aspen, personal fees from Instrumentation Laboratory (Werfen) and personal fees from Sanofi during the preparation of this consensus statement.

  • 1. Warkentin TE, Levine MN, Hirsh J, et al. Heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia in patients treated with low‐molecular‐weight heparin or unfractionated heparin. N Engl J Med 1995; 332: 1330–1335.
  • 2. Arepally GM. Heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia. Blood 2017; 129: 2864–2872.
  • 3. Greinacher A, Selleng K, Warkentin TE. Autoimmune heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia. J Thromb Haemost 2017; 15: 2099–2114.
  • 4. Greinacher A, Warkentin TE, Chong BH. Heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia. In: Michelson AD. Platelets. 3rd ed. Academic Press, 2012: p. 851–882.
  • 5. Cuker A. Clinical and laboratory diagnosis of heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia: an integrated approach. Semin Thromb Hemost 2014; 40: 106–114.
  • 6. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 2008; 336: 924–926.
  • 7. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. Going from evidence to recommendations. BMJ 2008; 336: 1049–1051.
  • 8. Lo GK, Juhl D, Warkentin TE, et al. Evaluation of pretest clinical score (4 T's) for the diagnosis of heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia in two clinical settings. J Thromb Haemost 2006; 4: 759–765.
  • 9. Cuker A, Gimotty PA, Crowther MA, Warkentin TE. Predictive value of the 4Ts scoring system for heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Blood 2012; 120: 4160–4167.
  • 10. Cuker A, Arepally G, Crowther MA, et al. The HIT Expert Probability (HEP) Score: a novel pre‐test probability model for heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia based on broad expert opinion. J Thromb Haemost 2010; 8: 2642–2650.
  • 11. Messmore HL, Fabbrini N, Bird ML, et al. Simple scoring system for early management of heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 2011; 17: 197–201.
  • 12. Lillo‐Le Louët A, Boutouyrie P, Alhenc‐Gelas M, et al. Diagnostic score for heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia after cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thromb Haemost 2004; 2: 1882–1888.
  • 13. Lau KKE, Mohammed S, Pasalic L, Favaloro EJ. Laboratory testing protocols for heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) testing. Methods Mol Biol 2017; 1646: 227–243.
  • 14. Bakchoul T, Giptner A, Najaoui A, et al. Prospective evaluation of PF4/heparin immunoassays for the diagnosis of heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia. J Thromb Haemost 2009; 7: 1260–1265.
  • 15. Pouplard C, Gueret P, Fouassier M, et al. Prospective evaluation of the ‘4Ts’ score and particle gel immunoassay specific to heparin/PF4 for the diagnosis of heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia. J Thromb Haemost 2007; 5(7): 1373–9.
  • 16. Favaloro EJ, McCaughan G, Pasalic L. Clinical and laboratory diagnosis of heparin induced thrombocytopenia: an update. Pathology 2017; 49: 346–355.
  • 17. Sachs UJ, von Hesberg J, Santoso S, et al. Evaluation of a new nanoparticle‐based lateral‐flow immunoassay for the exclusion of heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Thromb Haemost 2011; 106: 1197–1202.
  • 18. Favaloro EJ, McCaughan G, Mohammad SF, et al. HIT or miss? A comprehensive contemporary investigation of laboratory tests for heparin induced thrombocytopenia. Pathology 2018; 50: 426–436.
  • 19. Vianello F, Sambado L, Scarparo P, et al. Comparison of three different immunoassays in the diagnosis of heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia. Clin Chem Lab Med 2015; 53: 257–263.
  • 20. Berroeta C, Crespin M, Bouabdallah K, et al. Diagnostic performance of a new rapid lateral flow immunoassay in patients suspected of heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia and its clinical consequences. Sem Thromb Hemost 2016; 42: 69–74.
  • 21. Kolde HJ, Habrecht U, von Hesberg J, et al. Multicentric validation of a rapid assay for heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia with different specimen types. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 2014; 25: 6–9.
  • 22. Lau KKE, Mohammed S, Pasalic L, Favaloro EJ. Laboratory testing protocols for heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) testing. In: Favaloro EJ, Lippi G, editors. Hemostasis and thrombosis: methods and protocols. New York: Springer, 2017. p. 227–243.
  • 23. Althaus K, Hron G, Strobel U, et al. Evaluation of automated immunoassays in the diagnosis of heparin induced thrombocytopenia. Thromb Res 2013; 131: e85–e90.
  • 24. Whitlatch NL, Kong DF, Metjian AD, et al. Validation of the high‐dose heparin confirmatory step for the diagnosis of heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia. Blood 2010; 116: 1761–1766.
  • 25. Whitlatch NL, Perry SL, Ortel TL. Anti‐heparin/platelet factor 4 antibody optical density values and the confirmatory procedure in the diagnosis of heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia. Thromb Haemost 2008; 100: 678–684.
  • 26. Altuntas F, Matevosyan K, Burner J, et al. Higher optical density of an antigen assay predicts thrombosis in patients with heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia. Eur J Haematol 2008; 80: 429–435.
  • 27. Warkentin TE, Sheppard JI, Moore JC, et al. Quantitative interpretation of optical density measurements using PF4‐dependent enzyme‐immunoassays. J Thromb Haemost 2008; 6: 1304–1312.
  • 28. Warkentin TE, Sheppard JA, Moore JC, et al. Laboratory testing for the antibodies that cause heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia: how much class do we need? J Lab Clin Med 2005; 146: 341–346.
  • 29. Morel‐Kopp MC, Mullier F, Gkalea V, et al. Heparin‐induced multi‐electrode aggregometry method for heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia testing: communication from the SSC of the ISTH. J Thromb Haemost 2016; 14: 2548–2552.
  • 30. Sheridan D, Carter C, Kelton JG. A diagnostic test for heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia. Blood 1986; 67: 27–30.
  • 31. White MM, Siders L, Jennings LK, White FL. The effect of residual heparin on the interpretation of heparin‐induced platelet aggregation in the diagnosis of heparin‐associated thrombocytopenia. Thromb Haemost 1992; 68: 88.
  • 32. Lippi G, Favaloro EJ. Preanalytical issues in hemostasis and thrombosis testing. Methods Mol Biol 2017; 1646: 29–42.
  • 33. Favaloro EJ. Laboratory tests for identification or exclusion of heparin induced thrombocytopenia: HIT or miss? Am J Hematol 2018; 93: 308–314.
  • 34. Tan CW, Ward CM, Morel‐Kopp MC. Evaluating heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia: the old and the new. Semin Thromb Hemost 2012; 38: 135–143.
  • 35. Caton S, O'Brien E, Pannelay AJ, Cook RG. Assessing the clinical and cost impact of on‐demand immunoassay testing for the diagnosis of heparin induced thrombocytopenia. Thromb Res 2016; 140: 155–162.
  • 36. Warkentin TE. Demand on‐demand testing for the diagnosis of heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia. Thromb Res 2016; 140: 163–164.
  • 37. Pouplard C, Leroux D, Regina S, et al. Effectiveness of a new immunoassay for the diagnosis of heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia and improved specificity when detecting IgG antibodies. Thromb Haemost 2010; 103: 145–150.
  • 38. Greinacher A, Ittermann T, Bagemuhl J, et al. Heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia: towards standardization of platelet factor 4/heparin antigen tests. J Thromb Haemost 2010; 8: 2025–2031.
  • 39. Warkentin TE, Sheppard JA, Moore JC, et al. Studies of the immune response in heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia. Blood 2009; 113: 4963–4969.
  • 40. Linkins LA, Dans AL, Moores LK, et al. Treatment and prevention of heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence‐Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest 2012; 141(2 Suppl): e495S–e530S.
  • 41. Cuker A. Management of the multiple phases of heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia. Thromb Haemost 2016; 116: 835–842.
  • 42. Stone GW, Witzenbichler B, Guagliumi G, et al. Bivalirudin during primary PCI in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 2218–2230.
  • 43. Lewis BE, Matthai WH Jr, Cohen M, et al. Argatroban anticoagulation during percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2002; 57: 177–184.
  • 44. Czosnowski QA, Finks SW, Rogers KC. Bivalirudin for patients with heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia undergoing cardiovascular surgery. Ann Pharmacother. 2008; 42: 1304–1309.
  • 45. Alatri A, Armstrong AE, Greinacher A, et al. Results of a consensus meeting on the use of argatroban in patients with heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia requiring antithrombotic therapy ‐ a European perspective. Thromb Res 2012; 129: 426–433.
  • 46. Magnani HN. A review of 122 published outcomes of danaparoid anticoagulation for intermittent haemodialysis. Thromb Res 2010; 125: e171–e176.
  • 47. Cope J, Bushwitz J, An G, Antigua A, et al. Clinical experience with prophylactic fondaparinux in critically ill patients with moderate to severe renal impairment or renal failure requiring renal replacement therapy. Ann Pharmacother 2015; 49: 270–277.
  • 48. Chong BH, Gallus AS, Cade JF, et al. Prospective randomised open‐label comparison of danaparoid with dextran 70 in the treatment of heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia. Thromb Haemost 2001; 86: 1170–1175.
  • 49. Farner B, Eichler P, Kroll H, Greinacher A. A comparison of danaparoid and lepirudin in heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia. Thromb Haemost 2001; 85: 950–957.
  • 50. Magnani HN, Gallus A. Heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). A report of 1,478 clinical outcomes of patients treated with danaparoid (Orgaran) from 1982 to mid‐2004. Thromb Haemost 2006; 95: 967–981.
  • 51. Kang M, Alahmadi M, Sawh S, et al. Fondaparinux for the treatment of suspected heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia: a propensity score‐matched study. Blood 2015; 125: 924–929.
  • 52. Schindewolf M, Steindl J, Beyer‐Westendorf J, et al. Use of fondaparinux off‐label or approved anticoagulants for management of heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017; 70: 2636–2648.
  • 53. Warkentin TE, Pai M, Linkins LA. Direct oral anticoagulants for treatment of HIT: update of Hamilton experience and literature review. Blood 2017; 130: 1104–1113.
  • 54. Selleng S, Selleng K. Heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia in cardiac surgery and critically ill patients. Thromb Haemost 2016; 116: 843–851.
  • 55. Warkentin TE, Kelton JG. Temporal aspects of heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia. N Engl J Med 2001; 344: 1286–1292.
  • 56. Warkentin TE, Sheppard JA. Serological investigation of patients with a previous history of heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia who are reexposed to heparin. Blood 2014; 123: 2485–2493.
  • 57. Warkentin TE, Anderson JA. How I treat patients with a history of heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia. Blood 2016; 128: 348–359.
  • 58. Padmanabhan A, Jones CG, Pechauer SM, et al. IVIg for treatment of severe refractory heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia. Chest 2017; 152: 478–485.


remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.