Connect
MJA
MJA

What is the value of professional opinion?

Hedley G Peach
Med J Aust 2011; 195 (2): . || doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2011.tb03227.x
Published online: 18 July 2011

To the Editor: The Journal recently drew attention to circumstances in which courts have not accepted professional opinions on standard of care required in negligence cases.1,2 These include opinions formed after consulting colleagues, from doctors trained overseas or unrepresentative of national peer professional practice.


  • Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Ballarat, VIC.


Correspondence: hpeach@unimelb.edu.au

  • 1. Katelaris AG. Reasonable practice is not defensive practice [editor’s choice]. Med J Aust 2011; 194: 219. <MJA full text>
  • 2. Mahar PD, Burke JA. What is the value of professional opinion? The current medicolegal application of the “peer professional practice defence” in Australia. Med J Aust 2011; 194: 253-255. <MJA full text>
  • 3. Linton and Repatriation Commission [2004] AATA V2002/691, s. 9, 11, 16, 18, 19-23, 32-49, 51-56.
  • 4. Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 [Cwlth], s. 9.
  • 5. Paramothayan NS, Jones PW. Corticosteroids for pulmonary sarcoidosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000; (4): CD001114.

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.