Open access CC BY NC
Research Priority Setting Is Not Research: A Call for Ethical Clarity in Australia
Authors: Bec Jenkinson, Gordon McGurk, Jonathan Quicke, Janelle Bowden, Nadine E. Foster
Correspondence: r.jenkinson@uq.edu.au
Published online: 29 July 2026
Abstract
In Australia, research priority setting (RPS) may be misclassified as research requiring ethics approval, despite its purpose as a collaborative, pre-research involvement activity. Treating RPS as research creates delays, diverts resources and undermines partnership principles central to inclusive, community-centred priority setting. Recent revisions to the National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research clarify that pre-research consultation does not require ethics review, creating an opportunity for consistent national practice. We call for institutions to recognise RPS as involvement and provide proportionate, non-ethics oversight to accelerate RPS and deliver more responsive research agendas that reduce waste.
Seven Vessel Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection and Concurrent Transient Global Amnesia After an Emotional Trigger
Michael J. Stewart, Tom R. Sutherland
Seven Vessel Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection and Concurrent Transient Global Amnesia After an Emotional Trigger
Virginia Barbour
Organ Donation After Oral Ingestion of a Voluntary Assisted Dying Substance
Joanne Kantianis, Helen I. Opdam, Rohit L. D'Costa
Equity, Diversity and Inclusion From the Start: Reforming Australia's Research Infrastructure for Inclusive Participation
Danielle M. Muscat, Kirsten J. McCaffery, Heather L. Shepherd, Marguerite Tracy
A Match Made in Health Care: Can Ethics and Governance Better Support Impactful Implementation Research?
Natalie Taylor, Zhicheng Li, Cathelijne van Kemenade, Jackie Curtis, Patrick Bolton
Genomic Newborn Screening: Commodity or Public Good?
Christopher Gyngell, Sebastian Lunke, Danya Vears, Zornitza L. Stark