Alarm about computed tomography scans is unjustified

Richard M Mendelson, Richard A Fox and Nicholas H de Klerk
Med J Aust 2010; 193 (4): . || doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2010.tb03884.x
Published online: 16 August 2010

To the Editor: Blecher correctly asserts that alarm is not the appropriate reaction to the potential dangers of computed tomography (CT) scans.1 Such alarm risks discouraging patients from having the CT scans they need. Appropriate CT scans are good; inappropriate ones are bad.

  • Richard M Mendelson1,2
  • Richard A Fox2
  • Nicholas H de Klerk3,2

  • 1 Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, WA.
  • 2 University of Western Australia, Perth, WA.
  • 3 Telethon Institute for Child Health Research, Perth, WA.


remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.