Letters
Women's health Vascular diseases
Volume 192 - Issue 8

Pregnancy after aortic replacement graft

Author:  H Reginald Magee

Med J Aust 2010; 192 (8): 479-480. || doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2010.tb03598.x
Published online: 19 April 2010
Download PDF (58 KB)
Share: Share on Blue Sky Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share by email

To the Editor: Pregnancy following aorto-iliac bypass or replacement grafting is uncommon, as most patients requiring this operation are beyond childbearing age. However, conditions may occur at earlier ages that necessitate such a procedure and, as the case described here illustrates, the surgery is no bar to pregnancy.

In 1982, a 13-year-old girl presented to hospital after two episodes of abdominal pain. Ultrasound examination showed a large dumbbell-shaped retroperitoneal tumour widely separating the aorta and vena cava.

Laparotomy revealed a large tumour firmly adherent to the inferior vena cava and completely surrounding the aorta. Biopsy showed it to be a ganglioneuroma. It was possible to separate the tumour from the vena cava but not the aorta, as no plane could be defined, and during the dissection a hole was made in the vessel. The involved aorta was resected and the tumour was able to be completely removed. The removed segment was replaced with a 10 mm woven dacron tube graft (compatible with the host aorta) from the infrarenal level to the aortic bifurcation.

Five years later, the aortic graft thrombosed. Exploration showed no evidence of recurrence of the tumour, and the previous graft was replaced with a 14 × 7 mm gelatin-impregnated, knitted dacron bifurcated prosthesis from the infrarenal aorta to each common iliac artery. The patient had regular follow-up, including ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging scans.

In June 2007, after I had retired from vascular surgery, I was contacted by the patient (now aged 39 years), who was seeking information about her previous operations because she was 14 weeks pregnant and her obstetrician was concerned about the uterine blood supply. She had approached the hospital, but was told that her records had been destroyed. Fortunately, I still had my personal records of her previous surgery.

The patient had required in-vitro fertilisation for conception because her uterine tubes were blocked. The pregnancy proceeded normally until the 36th week, when signs of eclampsia developed. Caesarian section was performed at 37 weeks and a healthy infant was delivered.

A review of the literature revealed six other reported cases of pregnancy occurring in patients who had had previous aortic grafting for aneurysmal or atherosclerotic disease.1-6 Two patients had caesarean section and the others were delivered vaginally; all infants were viable.

Possible concerns expressed by clinicians in cases such as this include compromise of the pelvic circulation, affecting foetal development; compression of the graft by the fetal head during delivery; uterine contractions contributing to graft occlusion; reduction of blood flow through the graft because of the patient’s position during labour; and false aneurysm formation at the anastomotic sites, with an increased risk of rupture.

With adequate assessment and supervision by obstetric and vascular surgical teams, the outcome of pregnancy in women with a history of aortic grafting should be favourable.

Author

  • H Reginald Magee1
  • 1. Brisbane, QLD.

Correspondence: reginaldm@bigpond.com

References

View this article on Wiley Online Library