Connect
MJA
MJA

The Research Quality Framework

E Malcolm Symonds
Med J Aust 2006; 184 (12): . || doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2006.tb00431.x
Published online: 19 June 2006

To the Editor: Shewan and Coats1 are right to draw attention to the shortcomings of the Research Assessment Exercise (RAE) in the United Kingdom in relation to the formulation of the Research Quality Framework in Australia. The impact of the RAE on clinical academic medicine in the UK has been disastrous, and it will take years to recover.


  • University of Nottingham, UK.


Correspondence: profems@aol.com

  • 1. Shewan LG, Coats AJS. The Research Quality Framework and its implications for health and medical research: time to take stock? Med J Aust 2006; 184: 463-466. <MJA full text>
  • 2. Clinical academic staffing levels in UK medical and dental schools. Data update 2004. A survey by the Council of Heads of Medical Schools and Council of Heads and Deans of Dental Schools. Jun 2005. Available at: http://www.chms.ac.uk/CHMS&CHDDS%20Survey%20of%20Clinical%20Academic%20Numbers%20June%202005.pdf (accessed May 2006).
  • 3. Symonds EM, Bell P, Banatvala J. Five futures for academic medicine: future of academic medicine looks bleak. BMJ 2005; 331: 694.

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.