MJA 219 6 18 September cover

Issues

Volume 219 Issue 6

18 September 2023

Editor’s choice

18 September 2023 Free

Supporting an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Voice to Parliament

This issue of the MJA includes our editorial supporting an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Voice to Parliament (doi: ). We came to this view after an extensive process that included discussion with our Editorial Advisory Group, a number of Indigenous and other academics, and internal discussions. I am grateful to everyone who provided thoughtful advice and feedback. We received strong, evidenced‐based feedback that the Voice offers a practical route to improving health outcomes. The evidence from recent events is clear. As the editorial notes: “The health outcomes in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander populations during the COVID‐19 pandemic provide an outstanding example of how outcomes are best when Aboriginal people have a voice.” The referendum on the Voice to Parliament will be held on Saturday, 14 October 2023. At this historic moment for Australia, we encourage readers to read the editorial and other information on the Voice and carefully consider the evidence ahead of the referendum. Publishing our editorial on the Voice is just one manifestation of our key role as a medical journal — to publish research and opinions that analyse policy or which document clinical findings that have the potential to influence practice. Other articles in this issue continue this theme. The research by Ng and colleagues is an example of potentially practice‐changing research (doi: ). They investigate primary aldosteronism (indicated by an elevated plasma aldosterone‐to‐renin ratio) — the most frequent endocrine cause of hypertension — in Indigenous and non‐Indigenous Australians in the Northern Territory. The findings are striking: more than a quarter of relatively young (32–35 years of age) Indigenous and non‐Indigenous Australians had elevated aldosterone‐to‐renin ratios. These findings warrant serious consideration as a modifiable cause of hypertension. As the related editorial by Funder notes: “Many of us were taught that [primary aldosteronism] was a rare and relatively mild cause of secondary hypertension, but both these assessments are now known to be erroneous.” (doi: ). Medical journals also have a role in shining a light on practices that may influence medicine and those who practise it. In a research letter, Jones assesses financial support provided to male and female physicians by pharmaceutical companies in New Zealand from eight publicly available funding reports for 2021 (doi: ). Although the data are not complete — for example, one company did not provide a 2021 report — the findings are fascinating and suggest areas for future study. Although the median payment level was similar for men and women, female physicians received fewer support payments from pharmaceutical companies than their male colleagues, and a larger proportion of payments to women subsidised event attendance rather than, for example, speaker and educator fees. In a related editorial, Mintzes and Menkes note the accepted global recognition of the need for public disclosure of industry funding of clinicians (doi: ). They point out the limitations of the study but note that it largely mirrors results from elsewhere. They raise a fascinating question worthy of future research: “whether female patients are more affected than men by treatment choices influenced by industry payments.” To conclude by returning to the Voice referendum, I encourage readers to review the arguments for the Voice, as we do for all of the research and opinion we publish, in an evidence‐led manner that centres core public health principles of equity, justice, and recognition of the upstream determinants of health.

Virginia Barbour

Perspective

Perspectives

Medical education

Reflection

Erratum

18 September 2023 Free

Erratum

Walsh SM, Versace VL, Thompson SC, et al. Supporting nursing and allied health student placements in rural and remote Australia: a narrative review of publications by university departments of rural health. Med J Aust 2023; 219 (3 Suppl): S14‐S19. https://doi.org/10.5694/mja2.52032. In this narrative review, the name of the fourth author was incorrect; her name is Leanne J Brown.

Editorials

Research

Research letter

Consensus statement

News

3 October 2023 Media release Free

Australian-first study calls for screening of family members for coeliac disease

An Australian-first study, published in the Medical Journal of Australia, has found significant prevalence of undiagnosed coeliac disease among first degree relatives of people already diagnosed. The study findings support existing overseas recommendations for screening of first degree relatives for coeliac disease. Coeliac disease is an autoimmune disorder where the ingestion of gluten in genetically susceptible individuals causes gastrointestinal symptoms. Delayed diagnosis of coeliac disease can lead to serious health complications such as osteoporosis, infertility, and small bowel cancer. “We undertook this research to look at the value of finding cases of coeliac disease in people at high risk of coeliac disease in Australia,” lead author Dr James Daveson said. Researchers at the Wesley Research Institute in Brisbane set out to determine the prevalence of undiagnosed coeliac disease among first degree relatives of people who had been diagnosed. A total of 202 first degree relatives (children, siblings or parents) of 134 people with coeliac disease were invited to undergo testing for coeliac disease. Testing included HLA-DQ2/8/7 polymerase chain reaction genotyping for coeliac disease risk alleles and, where possible, small bowel biopsy. The study found seven of 62 child first degree relatives of people with coeliac disease had biopsy-confirmed disease, yielding an estimated prevalence of 11%. For those with coeliac disease susceptibility haplotypes, the prevalence was 14%. Dr Daveson hopes the study will emphasise to health practitioners the importance of family screening for coeliac disease. “Defining such a high rate of undiagnosed … high risk children with coeliac disease is important for Australian health practitioners,” Dr Daveson said. “The most important outcome of this study will be if it highlights the need for first degree relatives of people with coeliac disease to be screened for coeliac disease themselves.”

Annika Howells

18 September 2023 Media release Free

Increased risk of death from breast cancer in women if treatment interval guidelines are not followed

The risk of death from breast cancer is 43% higher for women who had at least one treatment interval longer than the recommended treatment timeframes, according to new research. The research, published in the Medical Journal of Australia, examined associations between breast cancer survival and timeliness of treatment. It found that breast cancer-specific survival was poorer for women with breast cancer who received treatment outside the recommended treatment interval timeframes, which are defined by the 2020 Australian guidelines for the treatment for early breast cancer (here). Breast cancer is the second most frequent cause of cancer-related deaths of Australian women, Dr Kou Kou said, who was the lead author of the study and is the Senior Research Officer of Epidemiology at Cancer Council Queensland. “Despite recent efforts to improve therapy, between 33% [and] 52% of women diagnosed with breast cancer do not receive timely treatment,” Dr Kou Kou said. “Our study shows that any delay in commencing or continuing treatment is associated with poorer survival.” The guidelines for the treatment of early breast cancer list six treatment intervals: diagnosis to neoadjuvant therapy (neoadjuvant systemic therapy should start as soon as diagnosis and staging is complete, ideally within two to four weeks);neoadjuvant therapy to surgery (surgery should be performed within four to six weeks of neoadjuvant systemic therapy, allowing for recovery from myelosuppression);diagnosis to surgery (surgery should be performed within one month of decision to treat with surgery for women who do not receive neoadjuvant therapy);surgery to chemotherapy (adjuvant chemotherapy should commence within four to six weeks of surgery);surgery to radiotherapy (women who have completed definitive surgery for breast cancer should commence radiotherapy as soon as possible after wound healing, and within eight weeks of surgery if no adjuvant chemotherapy received); andchemotherapy to radiotherapy (women who have completed definitive surgery for breast cancer should commence radiotherapy within three to four weeks of completing adjuvant chemotherapy). The researchers at Cancer Council Queensland conducted a population-based cohort study of women aged 20–79 years diagnosed with invasive breast cancer between 1 March 2010 and 30 June 2013, as recorded on the Queensland Cancer Register. “We compared treatment intervals for each participating woman with the guidelines,” Professor Peter Baade said, a biostatistician and senior manager of descriptive epidemiology at Cancer Council Queensland. “We found the risk of death from breast cancer was significantly greater for women who underwent surgery more than 29 days after diagnosis, or commenced chemotherapy more than 36 days after surgery, or commenced radiotherapy more than 31 days after completing adjuvant chemotherapy, compared to women who received treatment before the corresponding time points. “The risk of death from breast cancer is 43% higher for women who had at least one treatment interval longer than the recommended timeframe.” There are several reasons why women may have longer than recommended treatment intervals, the researchers said. “A patient’s treatment intervals may be affected by a number of factors, including if they live in regional or remote Australia,” Dr Kou Kou said. “Women using public screening facilities tend to have longer intervals compared to those using private ones. And timing matters too; starting or completing treatment in December to January often leads to longer intervals between treatments. “Women without a family history of ovarian or breast cancer often have longer treatment intervals compared to those with a family history. Smoking, lower household income, and not having private health insurance were linked to longer intervals.” “Therefore, it is vital that the 2020 Australian guidelines for the treatment for early breast cancer are followed as closely as possible. “The clinical evidence is in: these guidelines save lives, so we need to make sure they are being followed by clinicians to give their patients the best chance of survival.” Read the research in the Medical Journal of Australia

Sam Hunt

25 September 2023 Media release Free

Preventative health checks reaching women who need it most

New research has found general practitioners (GPs) are proactively providing preventive health checks to women in mid-life who need it most, possibly due to sufficient Medicare rebates. The research, published in the Medical Journal of Australia, analysed data from the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women’s Health (ALSWH) to determine whether preventive health checks were being carried out on women in mid-life with the greatest need, as often people who are most in need are the ones who receive the least care. “We wanted to know if the patients getting preventive health checks were those who needed them most and if a patient’s economic position might be a barrier to access,” Professor Jenny Doust said, the study’s senior researcher and clinical professorial research fellow of The University of Queensland. The types of preventive health checks generally available for women aged between 40 and 49 years are checks for those at risk of type 2 diabetes and chronic disease, as well as a heart health check. The research found that women were more likely to have had health checks if they had risk factors for chronic disease, which was in contrast to previous research which found that fewer GP services are provided to people with unhealthy lifestyles. The new findings were mirrored in a recent study looking at the uptake of health checks for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, which found these went to those who had the greatest health care needs. “Our work shows that, in Australian primary care, people who need preventive care the most are more likely to receive it,” Professor Doust said. “We often hear about the inverse care law, that is the ability to access health care varies inversely with need. “There is some previous evidence of the inverse care law in Australian general practice, with people who have unhealthy behaviours using fewer GP services and those living in disadvantaged areas having shorter GP consultation times. “Our study shows that the inverse care law doesn’t seem to apply here.” The research authors believe one explanation might be that the Medicare rebate paid to GPs for preventive health is at a sufficiently high level for GPs to be incentivised to provide this care. The fact that fewer women in the study underwent heart health checks suggests the rebate for this service may be inadequate compared with the rebate for health checks for diabetes and chronic disease. “It is hard to design health care funding so that people who need care receive it, without also incentivising overservicing to those who can afford to pay more,” Professor Doust said. “Partly, we rely on health care providers being motivated to provide equitable care.” “Our study suggests GPs are doing that.”

Annika Howells

Next Issue Volume 219 Issue 7

View more
MJA 219 7 2 Oct cover
Editor’s choice 2 October 2023 Free

Responding to the challenges of emerging health threats

Virginia Barbour

Perspectives 4 September 2023 Open Access

Carbapenemase‐producing Enterobacterales: a profound threat to Australian public health

Erin Flynn · Lito E Papanicolas · Nicholas Anagnostou · Morgyn S Warner · Geraint B Rogers · Erin Flynn · Lito E Papanicolas · Nicholas Anagnostou · Morgyn S Warner · Geraint B Rogers

Perspectives 2 October 2023 Open Access

Sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor‐induced ketoacidosis is unlikely in patients without diabetes

Lisa M Raven · Christopher A Muir · Jerry R Greenfield

Medical education 4 September 2023 Lessons from practice Open Access

Breakthrough mpox despite two‐dose vaccination

Madhara N Weerasinghe · Catriona Ooi · George Kotsiou · Vincent J Cornelisse · Arran Painter · Madhara N Weerasinghe · Catriona Ooi · George Kotsiou · Vincent J Cornelisse · Arran Painter

Previous Issue Volume 219 Issue 5

View more
MJA 219 5 4 Sept cover
Editor’s choice 4 September 2023 Free

Collective voices: the role of medical journals in advocating for global health

Virginia Barbour

Perspectives 14 August 2023 Open Access

The changing landscape of clinical trials in Australia

Anna Lene Seidler · Melina L Willson · Mason Aberoumand · Jonathan G Williams · Kylie E Hunter · Angie Barba · R John Simes · Angela Webster

Perspectives 31 July 2023 Open Access

Australian National Clinical Evidence Taskforce COVID‐19 drug treatment guidelines: challenges of producing a living guideline

For the COVID‐19 Drug Treatment Panel of the National Clinical Evidence Taskforce

Medical education 4 September 2023 Lessons from practice Open Access

Management of opiate dependence related to dihydrocodeine–sorbitol misuse

Richard CJ Bradlow · Baden Hicks · Temika Mu · Daniel Pham · Michelle Sharkey · Noel Plumley · Dan I Lubman · Shalini Arunogiri

Subscribe to MJA email alerts

No spam, you can unsubscribe anytime you want.

By providing your information, you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Thanks for Subscribing! Tell us more

Your email updates will use your name.

Good one! Your updates are coming

Thank you for subscribing to the MJA email alerts. Receive the latest content in your inbox.