Volume 218 - Issue 11

Influenza and pertussis vaccine coverage in pregnancy in Australia, 2016–2021

Authors:  Jocelynne E McRae, Lisa McHugh, Catherine King, Frank H Beard, Christopher C Blyth, Margie H Danchin, Michelle L Giles, Hassen Mohammed, Nicholas Wood and Kristine Macartney

Med J Aust 2023; 218 (11): 528-541. || doi: 10.5694/mja2.51989
Published online: 19 June 2023

Maternal influenza and pertussis vaccine coverage rates appear to be increasing, at least in parts of Australia, but significant gaps remain

Summary

  • Vaccination in pregnancy is the best strategy to reduce complications from influenza or pertussis infection in infants who are too young to be protected directly from vaccination. Pregnant women are also at risk of influenza complications preventable through antenatal vaccination. Both vaccines are funded under the National Immunisation Program for pregnant women in Australia, but coverage is not routinely reported nationally.
  • We reviewed all reported Australian maternal influenza and pertussis vaccine coverage data for the period 2016–2021, to identify gaps and information needs.
  • Maternal influenza vaccine coverage was suboptimal at <58% for 2016–2018, with higher coverage of 62–75% reported in two states (Victoria and Western Australia) for 2019–2021. Maternal pertussis vaccine coverage from 2016 was generally higher than for influenza at >70%, with the highest jurisdictional coverage of 89% reported in Western Australia in 2020.
  • Vaccination rates were often suboptimal among First Nations pregnant women and up to 20% lower than among non‐First Nations Australian women; while data were limited, coverage was low among culturally and linguistically diverse women and among women of lower socio‐economic status.
  • Jurisdictional perinatal data collections were the best source of information on antenatal vaccine coverage but were only available for a minority of the population; a nationally consistent systematic approach is lacking.
  • Timely and comprehensive data are needed to provide feedback to improve maternal vaccination coverage, particularly among groups with higher risk and/or low uptake, and as new vaccines are recommended, including COVID‐19 vaccination.

Achieving high vaccine coverage in populations with higher risks of complications from vaccine‐preventable diseases is key to ensure maximum individual and population‐level benefit. Before the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic, influenza was the most commonly reported vaccine‐preventable disease across all age groups in Australia,1,2 with infants aged <6 months and pregnant women at higher risk of complications, including death, compared with older children and adults of similar age, respectively.3,4,5,6 Influenza vaccination given during pregnancy reduces these risks during pregnancy and in the early post partum period, and among infants aged <6 months.4,7,8,9,10,11 Pertussis infection in young infants, while less prevalent compared with influenza,1 poses a severe threat to those aged <4 months who have not yet derived protection from their primary vaccination course.12 Infants aged <6 months are too young to be vaccinated against influenza and can only be partially immunised against pertussis infections; protection is best mediated via passive maternal transplacental antibody transfer.7,13,14,15,16

Seasonal influenza vaccination in pregnancy (maternal vaccination) has been recommended in Australia since 2000 and the vaccine has been funded for all pregnant women on the National Immunisation Program (NIP) since 2010.17 Pertussis‐containing vaccines, which also include diphtheria and tetanus antigens, have been recommended in pregnancy since 2013 for women in their third trimester.18 All Australian states and territories had funded a program for pregnant women by June 2015, which was replaced by NIP funding from July 2018.19 In 2019, the recommended timing of pertussis vaccination in pregnancy was revised to occur any time from 20 weeks’ gestation (down from 28 weeks), to allow for earlier maternal antibody transfer and improve opportunities for protection in infants born preterm.20

Estimates of maternal influenza and pertussis vaccine coverage in Australia have historically been derived from ad hoc descriptive observational studies and in select populations. Contemporary, timely and consistent national data on maternal vaccine coverage are critical to identify areas of low coverage and evaluate the effectiveness of strategies to increase vaccine uptake if low. We sought to better understand all data sources estimating maternal influenza and pertussis vaccine coverage from 2016 (by which time both vaccines were funded for use across Australia) to 2021, to describe data gaps and examine trends in coverage over time, including among First Nations women. Additionally, we describe vaccine coverage, not presently well understood among women of culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) background (women born overseas or those who speak languages other than English), and women experiencing socio‐economic disadvantage.

Method

For this narrative review, the following databases were used to identify relevant literature: Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Informit. A full outline of the search strategy is included in the Supporting Information. Grey literature was also identified from government websites of all states and territories of Australia (Supporting Information, appendix 1). Data were reviewed between 4 March and 30 June 2022.

Studies were restricted to quantitative data analysis of influenza and/or pertussis vaccination in pregnancy from January 2016 to December 2021. We included studies that crossed multiple calendar years or influenza seasons where data from 2016 onwards were included. Studies were excluded if vaccination in pregnancy could not be distinguished from pre‐conception vaccination or postnatal vaccination, or were based only on intention to vaccinate. Interventional studies are described in this review; however, post‐intervention data were excluded from summary vaccine coverage estimates assuming that individual vaccine uptake was influenced by the intervention itself. Post‐intervention vaccine coverage is described separately (Supporting Information, table 1). Coverage among control groups in these studies was excluded if they did not meet review inclusion criteria.

Study data were tabulated with vaccine coverage shown by year and how vaccine status was determined; for example, by a vaccination provider, an immunisation register or via self‐report. Trends in vaccine coverage were reported according to source data. Vaccine coverage, reported as percentages, was calculated from the original studies as the number of women vaccinated during pregnancy divided by the number of women for whom vaccination status was known. We reviewed demographic data regarding First Nations status, CALD background, and socio‐economic status (SES) via the Socio‐Economic Index for Areas (SEIFA). Where possible, content experts and authors were contacted for more information; for example, denominators that were not available from the publication. Manual calculations were created from published data in some instances to provide a breakdown in coverage by year, coverage excluding missing data, and to report coverage that was only shown graphically.

There were 171 records extracted from core databases and an additional 25 studies identified from government websites and publication reference lists. After removal of duplicates and studies that did not meet eligibility criteria, 28 reports provided information on either maternal influenza or pertussis vaccine coverage for the period 2016–2021 (Box 1). A small subset of these studies (n = 12) provided maternal vaccination data among either First Nations women, women of CALD background, and/or by SES. Sample sizes ranged from 55 to 269493 participants, with a total number of more than 880000 women providing data across the 28 independent studies.

Influenza vaccine coverage in pregnancy

There were 24 studies that reported on maternal influenza vaccine coverage in differing jurisdictional populations, 11 of which were from Victoria (Box 2). Vaccination status was collected by self‐report in 11 studies; one was presumed self‐report24 (based on prior report methods23); four were validated from a vaccine provider, hand‐held antenatal medical record, immunisation register or other medical documents, and eight were based on data entered into a perinatal database which permitted inclusion of sighted evidence (a record) of vaccination in pregnancy as well as self‐reported uptake to the notifying midwife/medical practitioner (Box 2).45,46

Of the 24 studies, 21 provided information on maternal influenza vaccine coverage (or proportion vaccinated), which ranged from 32% to 75% for the period 2016–2021 (Box 3). Coverage was below 40% in three studies including one multijurisdictional Australian study in 2016–2017,44 and two studies from Queensland in 2017, one of which was a population surveillance report and the other a large cross‐sectional survey (n = 968; Box 2 and Box 3).23,25 The highest coverage for maternal influenza vaccine was 75% in 2019 from a Victorian population surveillance report (n = 77779; Box 2 and Box 3).37 Published data for maternal influenza vaccine coverage in 2020 and 2021 were less common than in earlier years, with data only available from one source each year (WA Midwives Notification System).41

Three studies were interventional and none contributed pre‐intervention data as they were either duplicate data from other studies or pre‐dated 2016 (Box 2; Supporting Information, table 1A). Post‐intervention coverage reached 82% (n = 55)31 and 83% (n = 155)39 in two studies, while the third study reported a 50–196% increase in influenza vaccination coverage during pregnancy from baseline and an increase in monthly coverage reaching 90–100% (n = 11121).30

Pertussis vaccine coverage in pregnancy

There were 21 studies reporting maternal pertussis vaccine coverage, ten of which derived from Victoria (Box 4). Vaccination status was collected by self‐report in nine studies; one was presumed self‐report,24 based on prior report methods;23 four had records validated from a vaccine provider, the hand‐held antenatal medical record, immunisation register or other medical document, and seven were based on a perinatal database (with either sighted evidence of vaccination in pregnancy and/or self‐report) (Box 4).45,46

Of the 21 studies, 17 provided information on maternal pertussis vaccine coverage (or proportion vaccinated) that was predominantly greater than 70% for the period 2016–2021 (Box 4 and Box 5). The lowest reported coverage of maternal pertussis vaccine of 49% was from a study in the Northern Territory in 2016 (Box 5).48 The highest coverage observed was from Western Australian population surveillance data: 88%, 89% and 88% annually for 2019, 2020 and 2021, respectively,51 and 89% in 2019 from a multijurisdictional survey (n = 81)43 (Box 4 and Box 5).

Four studies were interventional; none contributed pre‐intervention data to summary estimates as they were either duplicate data reported in other studies, pre‐dated 2016 or provided variable coverage estimates from multiple sites. (Box 4; Supporting Information, table 1B). After intervention, all four studies found >90% coverage of pertussis vaccine in pregnancy and up to 100% for monthly coverage from some study sites in Victoria.30

Maternal vaccine coverage among First Nations women

Among the 24 studies on maternal influenza vaccine coverage, five reported data among First Nations women from Queensland, Victoria and South Australia (Box 2 and Box 6). Coverage ranged from 22% to 45% (Box 6), including annual increases in coverage reported from Queensland surveillance data of 22%, 25% and 33% for 2016, 2017 and 2018, respectively.24 Coverage was 2–18% lower than in non‐Indigenous Australian women for influenza vaccine (Box 6).

Of the 21 studies on maternal pertussis vaccine coverage, six reported coverage in First Nations pregnant women from Queensland, Victoria, SA and the NT (Box 4 and Box 6). Coverage ranged between 43% and 68%, with annual increases also evident in Queensland where rates were 43%, 48% and 55% for 2016, 2017 and 2018, respectively24 (Box 4 and Box 6). Maternal pertussis vaccine coverage among First Nations women was 5–20% lower than among non‐First Nations Australian women (Box 6).

Maternal vaccine coverage among women of CALD background

Six studies reported data on maternal vaccination among women of CALD background compared with other Australian women. Regarding influenza vaccination, lower coverage was reported in one study (48% v 59%, n = 71),26 three studies reported similar coverage (49% v 50%, n = 170683;36 43% v 45%, n = 70635;35 48% v 49%, n = 123340), one study reported higher influenza vaccine coverage (54% v 41%, n = 1305),34 while another study found overseas regional variability in coverage compared with that of Australian‐born women for influenza vaccine (46–61% v 55%, n = 249798).29 In five studies, maternal pertussis vaccine coverage in women of CALD background ranged between 63% and 80%, which was predominantly lower compared with other Australian women, where coverage was 76–86% (N = 488731).29,34,35,36,40 Additionally, a study that included 69% of women of CALD background reported coverage of 57% (n = 489) and 61% (n = 204) for influenza and pertussis vaccines, respectively33 (Supporting Information, table 2).

Maternal vaccine coverage among socio‐economically disadvantaged women

Two studies provided data on vaccination of women of differing SES, reporting by SEIFA Index of Relative Socio‐economic Disadvantage (IRSD) quintiles (Supporting Information, table 3). Both studies, from Victoria, found that women who were living in the most socio‐economically disadvantaged quintiles of residence had the lowest maternal vaccine coverage compared with those from the least disadvantaged quintiles. The first study (2015–2017) reported an incremental increase in coverage from 39% to 53% (n = 72474) and from 68% to 77% (n = 70275) for influenza and pertussis vaccines, respectively.35 The second study (2021) reported narrower intervals between lowest and highest IRSD quintiles, ranging from 52% to 58% for influenza and from 75% to 77% (with mid quintiles of 78%) for pertussis.29

Discussion

We reviewed several maternal vaccination studies from multiple Australian jurisdictions and populations, providing a comprehensive synopsis of coverage data for two NIP‐funded maternal vaccines from 2016 to 2021. Maternal pertussis vaccine coverage was consistently higher than maternal influenza coverage for the same time period, although with an increasing trend towards 80–89% in 2019–2021 from WA's state‐based immunisation database.41 Influenza vaccine coverage was generally below 60%; however, perinatal data from Victoria and WA from 2019–2021 suggest increasing coverage rates compared with earlier years (62–75%).37,38,41 Higher coverage with pertussis vaccination compared with influenza may have occurred for a number of reasons; antenatal services may not promote or deliver influenza vaccine year round; no vaccine is available from the end of February (prior year vaccine expiry) to early April (current year vaccine availability) annually; risk from influenza may be perceived to be low; benefits to the infant may not be widely known (despite evidence strongly indicating protection);15,52,53 and provider attitudes may also affect vaccine promotion and delivery. Promotion of pertussis vaccination as providing benefit against serious illness and death in newborns likely influences women to be vaccinated each pregnancy.33,54 Studies have shown that targeted maternal vaccination strategies, training and specific interventions have increased vaccine uptake, but it is unclear how universal or sustained such changes have been.30,31,39,50

Only a few Australian states and territories provided regular data, and there was considerable variation between jurisdictions. Despite NIP funding, there were no nationally representative data, and no reporting by the Commonwealth Government. It was also unclear whether differences in vaccine coverage were real or due to study heterogeneity. For example, Queensland population health data from 2018 indicated maternal influenza vaccine coverage was 25% lower than in Victoria for the same year,24,38 where mandatory reporting to the Victorian Perinatal Data Collection has been in place since 2015 across public and private health services and may therefore be a better reflection of true coverage. Large population data from bigger jurisdictions of New South Wales and South Australia were not available, and we found no published data from Tasmania or the Australian Capital Territory. Nationally, there are about 300000 pregnancies each year (291712 in 2020);55 data on vaccine coverage in the majority is not reported at the public health level where, by comparison, national coverage data for influenza and pertussis is routinely available in other countries such as the United Kingdom, United States and Spain enabling comprehensive assessment of national vaccine programs and the fundamental components that drive uptake.56,57,58

Maternal vaccine coverage among First Nations women was up to 20% lower than coverage among non‐Indigenous Australian women. Similar coverage gaps were reported in a recent large multijurisdictional Australian study incorporating perinatal data from NT, WA and Queensland (not included in this review) on maternal vaccine coverage during 2012–2017 (n = 591868).59 This disparity in vaccine coverage needs urgent attention and may be addressed through health care provider recommendations, communication on the benefits and effectiveness of vaccination, and implementation of First Nations led program changes.60,61,62 These are underpinned by the need for timely, comprehensive data to inform strategies to improve coverage and ultimately afford greater protection of First Nations Australian women and their infants.

Maternal vaccine coverage among women of CALD background varied compared with women of other Australian backgrounds. One study found that women born overseas were less likely to have heard of vaccination for pertussis and/or influenza in pregnancy and would benefit from health care provider recommendations,33 but further understanding of culture‐specific gaps is needed to inform targeted vaccine promotion. Few studies reported maternal vaccine coverage among women by socio‐economic status that could provide any definitive understanding of coverage. Data on CALD and socio‐economic status should be routinely reported with vaccine coverage and used to inform vaccine promotion and delivery strategies. COVID‐19 vaccine uptake has been shown to be lower among certain CALD groups, but also responsive to tailored locally driven strategies to increase uptake.

We found that reporting from perinatal data collections, which obtain clinical and demographic information on all registered births at ≥20 weeks’ gestation,59 provided the largest and most representative sources of data on annual vaccine coverage for Victoria, Queensland and WA.23,24,37,38,41,51 Importantly, perinatal data collections provide the opportunity for data linkage with the Australian Immunisation Register (AIR) at either a national or jurisdictional level, which is essential for accurate assessment of coverage. The AIR has been capturing information on adult vaccinations since 2016,63 albeit non‐mandatory until recently, and informs national estimates on population coverage for vaccine‐preventable diseases in Australia. However, the AIR does not capture pregnancy status or at‐risk medical conditions.64 All states and territories should harmonise methodologies to include vaccination status and derive timely national population weighted estimates from jurisdictional data or perinatal data collection links to the AIR nationally; moreover, a range of options should be explored, including those using assets such as the AIR Multi‐Agency Data Integration Project65 incorporating linked Australian Government datasets, which provide demographic information such as SES and cultural diversity alongside vaccination status from the AIR. In the absence of a national perinatal database that includes vaccination status, we need real‐time data on antenatal vaccine coverage from each jurisdiction in Australia, to provide ongoing and systematic estimates similar to the way other vaccines are managed in the AIR.64

Limitations

This narrative review provides insight into national maternal vaccine coverage not well understood and has identified important gaps in data reporting that are vital for informing vaccine programs. However, given the nature of the study, we acknowledge the following limitations. No formal quality and risk of bias assessment was undertaken; data were extracted by a single person, although tabulated results were reviewed by a second and co‐authors provided input on familiar studies; the majority of studies reported vaccination status by self‐report, which may have led to over‐ or underestimation of vaccination coverage; and publication bias may be present with respect to inclusion of interventional studies. Comparison of coverage estimates in this review was challenging due to variations in denominators used for coverage assessment; the definition for “vaccinated” — whether determined from a validated source or by self‐report; and the definitions for women of CALD background and by SES, acknowledging that coverage of women who reside in the lowest SES area quintiles may include women who are not financially disadvantaged. In addition, there is a disproportionately higher number of studies (48%) in this review from Victoria, many of which use the same perinatal data collection data for different studies, and the demographic may not necessarily be representative of the rest of Australia. There is also a lack of consistently reported data (for example, by year) that is regionally representative from all jurisdictions of Australia, and some jurisdictional reports do not routinely report all data collected on various population groups.

Conclusion

Maternal influenza and pertussis vaccine coverage rates appear to be increasing, at least in parts of Australia, but significant gaps remain. Coverage among First Nations women for both influenza and pertussis vaccines in pregnancy remains consistently lower than for non‐Indigenous Australian women; addressing this is a priority, as is improving understanding of coverage across different SES and CALD groups. A lack of nationally representative information on maternal vaccination coverage limits the ability to use data‐driven evidence to evaluate the effectiveness of vaccine programs. A systematic approach to assess maternal vaccine coverage using data linkage, either across all jurisdictions or nationally via the AIR and national perinatal data collection linkage, is essential to provide accurate estimates.

Box 1 – Study selection process


 

Box 2 – Studies on influenza vaccine coverage in pregnancy

 

 

 

 

 

 

Vaccine coverage


State/territory

Publication

Study period

Study design**

Cohort description (participants, setting)

Validation of vaccination status

Total population

First Nations Australians

Non‐First Nations Australians


NT

Janagaraj et al 201921

2016

Perinatal database study

All births that occurred in NT public hospitals identified through the NT Perinatal Register during 2016

Validated (NT Immunisation Register)

Including pre‐conception: 1547/3392 (46%)
Excluding pre‐conception: 1358/3392 (40%)

Qld

Laurie et al 202122

May 2016–May 2018

Secondary analysis of randomised controlled trial (cross‐sectional cohort)

All pregnant women (First Nations or non‐First Nations Australian) in second or third trimester, attending First Nations‐specific primary care clinics and public hospitals in south‐east Queensland

Validated (Australian Immunisation Register)

142/310 (46%)

26/58 (45%)

116/252 (47%)

 

Department of Health 201823

2016–2017

Perinatal database study

Women who gave birth to one or more infants in Queensland during the study period

Self‐report only

34% (2017)

 

Department of Health 202024

2016–2018

Perinatal database study

Women who gave birth to one or more infants in Queensland during the study period

Not stated, presumed self‐report as for previous years

25050/59644 (42%; 2018)

~22% (2016); ~25% (2017); ~33% (2018)

~27% (2016); ~35% (2017); ~43% (2018)

 

Van Buynder et al 201925

Apr–Oct 2017

Survey

Postnatal women ≥18 years attending public vaccination clinics on the Gold Coast

Self‐report only

355/968 (37%)

NSW

Carlson et al 201926

Sep–Oct 2016

Survey

Pregnant women attending a public hospital antenatal clinic in Sydney

Self‐report only

38/71 (54%)

 

McRae et al 202127

Jul–Oct 2017

Survey

Pregnant women aged ≥18 years attending antenatal care at two public hospitals in Sydney

Self‐report only

369/642 (58%)

Vic

Giles et al 202028

2016–2017

Perinatal database study

Singleton births ≥28 weeks' gestation in Victoria

Self‐report and validated (VPDC)

Including unknown: 72764/154479 (47%)
Excluding unknown: 72764/143305 (51%)

 

Giles et al 202129

July 2015–Dec 2018

Perinatal database study

Singleton births ≥28 weeks' gestation in Victoria

Self‐report and validated (VPDC)

138698/269493 (52%)

 

Giles et al 202130

2019

Interventional

Pregnant women who attended one of six maternity services in Victoria

Self‐report and validated (VPDC)

N =11121
Coverage reached >90% across five of six health services for several months after May, an increase of 50–196% from baseline (control group coverage included in Victorian Perinatal Services Performance Indicators report)38

 

Kaufman et al 202031

Oct 2018–2019

Interventional

Pregnant women attending a public hospital antenatal clinic in Melbourne

Self‐report only

45/55 (82%) (control group coverage included in Victorian Perinatal Services Performance Indicators report)38

 

Krishnaswamy et al 201732

Aug–Dec 2016

Survey

Women who were admitted and delivered a healthy baby at one public hospital network and two private hospitals in Melbourne

Self‐report only

365/689 (55%)

 

Krishnaswamy et al 201833

Sept–Dec 2016

Survey

Women attending antenatal care at public health care network: Monash Health, Melbourne

Self‐report only

279/489 (57%)

 

Moir et al 202034

Jan 2017–Jan 2018

Survey

Women who delivered their infant at a large hospital in western Melbourne

Self‐report only

630/1305 (48%)

 

Rowe et al 201935

Jul 2015–Jun 2017

Perinatal database study

Pregnancies ending in the study period captured by the VPDC

Self‐report and validated (VPDC)

59938/153980 (39%; 2015–2017)
Median coverage: 45% (IQR, 34.7–52.6%; 2016–2017); 31925/72515 (44%; 2016, excluding missing data)

369/1049 (35%; 2016, excluding missing data)

31491/71723 (44%, excluding missing data)

 

Rowe et al 202136

Sep 2015 ‐ Dec 2017

Perinatal database study

Pregnancies ending in the study period captured by the VPDC. These were linked to five other databases capturing events of public health importance

Self‐report and validated (VPDC)

85830/186962 (46%)
85365/171377 (50%, excluding missing data)

1003/2486 (40%, excluding missing data)

84200/168247 (50%, excluding missing data)

 

Department of Health 202137

2018‐2019

Perinatal database study

Women who delivered an infant among both public and private hospitals statewide captured by the VPDC

Self‐report and validated (VPDC)

51828/77355 (67%; 2018)
58334/77779 (75%; 2019)

 

Department of Health 201938

2017–2018

Perinatal database study

Women who delivered an infant among both public and private hospitals statewide captured by the VPDC

Self‐report and validated (VPDC)

42244/78229 (54%; 2017)
51828/77355 (67%; 2018)

SA

Mohammed et al 201839

Nov 2014–July 2016

Interventional

Pregnant women aged ≥18 years attending antenatal care at a maternity hospital in Adelaide

Self‐report

Post intervention: 128/155 (83%)
Control group coverage not shown as predates 2016

 

Mohammed et al 202040

2015–2018

Prospective cohort study

Healthy nulliparous women who delivered at two public hospitals in Adelaide

Validated (medical case notes and pregnancy hand‐held records)

605/1263 (48%) (2015–16 influenza season: 40%; 2017–18 influenza season: 52%)

7/23 (30%)

598/1240 (48%)

WA

Department of Health 202241

2016–2021

Perinatal database study

Births registered in the Midwives Notification System

Self‐report and validated (Midwives Notification System§)

N =144475
6469/11432 (57%; 2016)
11177/23284 (48%; 2017)
14564/26629 (55%; 2018)
18235/27900 (65%; 2019)
19737/27317 (72%; 2020)
17384/27913 (62%; 2021)
All excluding unknown vaccination status||

Vic, SA, WA

Danchin et al 201842

Oct 2015–2016

Survey

Pregnant women attending public hospital antenatal clinics from four locations: Melbourne, Vic (2); Adelaide, SA (1); Perth, WA (1)

Self‐report only

132/290 (46%)

 

NSW, NT, Qld, SA, WA

Carlson et al 202243

2019

Survey

Mothers of infants <6 months of age and hospitalised for acute respiratory infection in five hospitals across Australia as captured by the PAEDS network

Self‐report only

44/81 (54%)

 

NT, Qld, NSW, Vic, SA, WA

McRae et al 202244

Apr–Nov 2016–2019

Test negative design, case control study

Mothers of infants aged <6 months test negative for influenza and hospitalised for acute respiratory infection in seven hospitals across Australia as captured by the PAEDS network

Validated (vaccination provider, health record or AIR)

164/435 (38%; 2016–2019)
14/44 (32%; 2016)
53/147 (36%; 2017)
41/86 (48%; 2018)
56/158 (35%; 2019)


AIR = Australian Immunisation Register; NSW = New South Wales; NT = Northern Territory; PAEDS = Paediatric Active Enhanced Disease Surveillance; Qld = Queensland; SA = South Australia; Vic = Victoria; VPDC = Victorian Perinatal Data Collection; WA = Western Australia.  ** The majority of studies are observational studies and defined further as: surveys — quantitative data on maternal vaccination are obtained via a questionnaire; perinatal database studies — these include studies that use state/territory‐wide perinatal data collections or perinatal registers where information on maternal vaccination is captured; case–control studies — defined by individuals who meet symptom eligibility criteria and who present to a medical facility/hospital, are tested for the disease of interest and are classified as either test‐positive cases or test‐negative controls; and interventional studies — these are experimental and have a control group. Vaccine coverage from interventional studies is shown pre‐ and post‐intervention where relevant.  * Where calendar years are not reported for coverage, the coverage shown is relative to the study period.  † Data shown was manually calculated/estimated from the published data.  ‡ Vaccine coverage is recorded by the midwife into the VPDC according to the mother's self‐recollection of vaccination or any written evidence.35,45  ¶ Exact data could not be located from source statistics: data estimated based on Queensland Health 2020 (Figure 5.13)24.  § Vaccine coverage is entered into the Midwives Notification System from a midwife, nurse or medical practitioner attending the birth and may include mother's self‐report of vaccination in pregnancy.46,47  || Data reported by the Midwives Notification System was total coverage in percentage points to 100% including unknown coverage. Numerator and denominator data were supplied by WA Health. Percentage coverage among women with known vaccination status was calculated by subtracting for women who reported unknown vaccination status. Vaccination data collection by the Midwives Notification System commenced in July 2016. The denominator is the number of women who gave birth.

Box 3 – Studies reporting influenza vaccine uptake in pregnancy, by year


Where possible, individual year data on vaccine coverage are shown in preference to combined year data. A published study may be shown multiple times, across years, where it has provided data for individual years. Where individual calendar year data could not be determined from published works, the total combined year coverage is shown by blue squares against the last year of captured vaccine data. Calendar years included in combined year vaccine coverage estimates are shown with author details in parentheses. Post‐intervention vaccine coverage from interventional studies has been excluded; reference group coverage from these studies is also not shown as data are already reported in other studies or predate 2016.

Box 4 – Studies on pertussis vaccine coverage in pregnancy

 

 

 

 

 

 

Vaccine coverage


State/territory

Publication

Study period

Study design**

Cohort description (participants, setting)

Validation of vaccination status

Total population

First Nations Australians

Non‐First Nations Australians


NT

Janagaraj et al 201948

2016

Perinatal database study

All births >24 weeks’ gestation that occurred in NT public hospitals identified through the NT Perinatal Register during 2016

Validated (NT Immunisation Register)

1660/3392 (49%)

591/1281 (46%)

1069/2111 (51%)

Qld

Laurie et al 202122

May 2016–May 2018

Retrospective cohort study

Pregnant women in second or third trimester attending First Nations‐specific primary care clinics and public hospitals in south‐east Queensland

Validated (AIR)

216/310 (70%)

31/58 (53%)

185/252 (73%)

 

Department of Health 201823

2016–2017

Perinatal database study

Women who gave birth to one or more infants in Queensland during the study period

Self‐report only

40500/~64285 (63%; 2017)

 

Department of Health 202024

2016–2018

Perinatal database study

Women who gave birth to one or more infants in Queensland during the study period

Not stated, presumed self‐report as for previous years

40557/59644 (68%; 2018)

~43% (2016); ~48% (2017); ~55% (2018)§

~55% (2016); ~65% (2017); ~70% (2018)

 

Van Buynder et al 201925

Apr–Oct 2017

Survey

Postnatal women aged ≥18 years attending public vaccination clinics on the Gold Coast

Self‐report only

864/1014 (85%)

NSW

Abdou et al 201749

Sept–Dec 2016 (audit period)

Retrospective cohort study

Third trimester women attending a public hospital antenatal clinic in Sydney

Validated (antenatal records, medication charts and pertussis vaccine administration register)

200/300 (67%)

Vic

Giles et al 202129

July 2015–Dec 2018

Perinatal database study

Singleton births ≥28 weeks’ gestation in Victoria

Self‐report and validated (VPDC)

192487/269493 (71%)

 

Giles et al 202130

2019

Interventional

Pregnant women who attended one of six maternity services in Victoria

Self‐report and validated (VPDC)

N =11121
Pertussis vaccine coverage reached >90% in five of six health services and up to 100% in three sites during the months of 2019 (control group coverage is included in the Victorian Perinatal Services Performance Indicators Report 2019–20)38

 

Kaufman et al 202031

Oct 2018–2019

Interventional

Pregnant women attending a public hospital antenatal clinic in Melbourne

Self‐report only

51/55 (93%)

 

Krishnaswamy et al 201732

Aug–Dec 2016

Survey

Women who were admitted and delivered a healthy baby at one public hospital network and two private hospitals in Melbourne

Self‐report only

479/689 (70%)

 

Krishnaswamy et al 201833

Sept–Dec 2016

Survey

Pregnant women, including non‐English speaking, attending antenatal care at a public health care network in Melbourne; pertussis vaccination coverage in pregnancy was reported for women ≥32 weeks’ gestation

Self‐report only

124/204 (61%)

 

Krishnaswamy et al 201850

Sept 2015–June 2017

Interventional

Women attending three different antenatal facilities in Monash Health

Self‐report and validated (VPDC)

N =1766 (68–91% post intervention with standing orders)
Median coverage from three control groups (Nov 2015–Nov 2016) varied: 39%, 55% and 65%
Median coverage from one control group in 2017 was 68%

 

Moir et al 202034

Jan 2017–Jan 2018

Survey

Women who delivered their infant at ≥32 weeks’ gestation at a large hospital in western Melbourne

Self‐report only

1082/1305 (83%)

 

Rowe et al 201935

July 2015–June 2017

Retrospective population cohort study

Pregnancies ≥28 weeks’ gestation that ended in the study period captured by the VPDC

Self‐report and validated (VPDC)

98853/153980 (64%; July 2015–June 17)
Median coverage: 80% (IQR, 65.1–86.3%)
51024/70316 (73%; 2016) excluding missing data

650/1040 (63%; 2016) excluding missing data

50250/18834 (72%) excluding missing data

 

Rowe et al 202136

Sept 2015–Dec 2017

Perinatal database study

Pregnancies that ended in the study period captured by the VPDC; these were linked to five other databases capturing events of public health importance

Self‐report and validated (VPDC)

128060/186920 (69%)
127026/168544 (75%) excluding missing data

1666/2459 (68%) excluding missing data

125050/165628 (76%) excluding missing data

 

Department of Health 201938

2017–2018

Perinatal database study

Women who delivered an infant among both public and private hospitals statewide captured by the VPDC

Self‐report and validated (VPDC)

61019/78229 (78%; 2017)
63431/77355 (82%; 2018)

SA

Mohammed et al 201839

Nov 2014–June 2016

Interventional

Pregnant women aged ≥18 years attending antenatal care at a maternity hospital in Adelaide

Self‐report

140/155 (90%) post intervention (control group coverage not shown as predates 2016)

 

Mohammed et al 202040

2015–2018

Prospective cohort study

Healthy nulliparous women who delivered an infant at ≥28 weeks’ gestation at two public hospitals

Validated (medical case notes and pregnancy hand‐held records)

1024/1296 (79%): 77% (2015); 81%, (2016); 78% (2017)

15/24 (63%)

1009/1272 (79%)

WA

Department of Health 202251

2016–2021

Perinatal database study

Births registered in the Midwives Notification System

Self‐report and validated (Midwives Notification System||)

N =146696
8546/11539 (74%; 2016)
18697/23879 (78%; 2017)
22623/27106 (83%; 2018)
24711/28066 (88%; 2019)
24459/27465 (89%; 2020)
25078/28641 (88%; 2021)
All excluding unknown status||

Vic, SA, WA

Danchin et al 201842

Oct 2015–2016

Survey

Pregnant women attending public hospital antenatal clinics from four locations: Melbourne, Victoria (2); Adelaide, SA (1); Perth, WA (1)

Self‐report only

236/290 (82%)

NSW, NT, Qld, SA, WA

Carlson et al 202243

2019

Survey

Mothers of infants <6 months of age and hospitalised for acute respiratory infection in five hospitals across Australia as captured by the PAEDS network

Self‐report only

72/81 (89%)


AIR = Australian Immunisation Register; NSW = New South Wales; NT = Northern Territory; PAEDS = Paediatric Active Enhanced Disease Surveillance; Qld = Queensland; SA = South Australia; Vic = Victoria; VPDC = Victorian Perinatal Data Collection; WA = Western Australia.  ** The majority of studies are observational studies and defined further as: surveys — quantitative data on maternal vaccination are obtained via a questionnaire; perinatal database studies — these include studies that use state/territory‐wide perinatal data collections or perinatal registers where information on maternal vaccination is captured; case–control studies — defined by individuals who meet symptom eligibility criteria and who present to a medical facility/hospital, are tested for the disease of interest and are classified as either test‐positive cases or test‐negative controls; and interventional studies — these are experimental and have a control group. Vaccine coverage from interventional studies is shown pre‐ and post‐intervention where relevant.  * Where calendar years are not reported for coverage, the coverage shown is relative to the study period.  † Data shown was manually calculated/estimated from the published data.  ‡ Vaccine coverage is recorded by the midwife into the VPDC according to the mother's self‐recollection of vaccination or any written evidence.35,45  ¶ Exact data could not be located from source statistics: data estimated based on Queensland Health 2020 (Figure 5.13)24.  § Vaccine coverage is entered into the Midwives Notification System from a midwife, nurse or medical practitioner attending the birth and may include mother's self‐report of vaccination in pregnancy.46,47  || Data reported by the Midwives Notification System was total coverage in percentage points to 100% including unknown coverage. Numerator and denominator data were supplied by WA Health. Percentage coverage among women with known vaccination status was calculated by subtracting for women who reported unknown vaccination status. Vaccination data collection by the Midwives Notification System commenced in July 2016. The denominator is the number of women who gave birth.

Box 5 – Studies reporting pertussis vaccine uptake in pregnancy, by year


Where possible, individual year data on vaccine coverage are shown in preference to combined year data. A published study may be shown multiple times, across years, where it has provided data for individual years. Where individual calendar year data could not be determined from published works, the total combined year coverage is shown by blue squares against the last year of captured vaccine data. Calendar years included in combined year vaccine coverage estimates are shown with author details in parentheses. Post‐intervention vaccine coverage from interventional studies has been excluded; reference group coverage from these studies is also not shown as data are already reported in other studies or predate 2016.

Box 6 – Studies reporting influenza and pertussis vaccine coverage in pregnancy among First Nations women compared with coverage among non‐First Nations women


NT = Northern Territory; Qld = Queensland; SA = South Australia; Vic = Victoria. The study period is denoted in parentheses following the author's name and year of publication. Data on influenza vaccine coverage were not available from the NT study.48


Authors


Competing interests


References


Provenance: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

More like this