Tackling antimicrobial resistance globally
Author: Rosalie Schultz
Published online: 2 April 2018
Your publication of a review on global approaches to antimicrobial resistance is timely.1 We especially note that antibiotic-resistant pathogens are not limited by borders, have greater impact on disadvantaged communities, and will require coordinated, high level government commitment to minimise their threat.1
In Australia, Indigenous communities bear a disproportionate burden of infectious diseases. This burden arises on a background of overcrowding, poorly built and maintained water and sanitation infrastructure, and colonisation of companion animals by human pathogens. The delivery of biomedically oriented health services leads to frequent use of broad spectrum antibiotics, promoting the development of multiresistant pathogens.2
The prominent multiresistant pathogen methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus first emerged in hospitals, but, in Australia, it was soon identified in remote Indigenous communities.2 Health services have been unable to control its development and spread. As a consequence, community-acquired methicillin-resistant S. aureus is now the dominant strain of this bacterium in Central Australia, where Indigenous people are one-quarter of the population, but bear three-quarters of the S. aureus disease burden in Alice Springs Hospital.3
Primary health care is founded on full community participation and an intersectoral approach, incorporating education, housing and other sectors to complement health services.4 Housing for Indigenous communities remains inadequate, and government responses deficient, particularly in remote regions.5 As a result, even high quality health services have limited impact on Indigenous people’s health and wellbeing. Safe, secure, functioning housing that is appropriate for its occupants is a building block to manage other areas of Indigenous disadvantage.5 The deficit in appropriate housing contributes to bacterial colonisation, infection and development of antimicrobial resistance among Indigenous Australians.2
“Illness is a weapon” was intended as a metaphor for the resistance of Indigenous people to their ongoing colonisation.6 However, the threat of antibiotic resistance evolving through the neglected conditions in which some communities find themselves could make this metaphor more real than was likely intended.
The spread of antibiotic-resistant pathogens in Indigenous communities and elsewhere is a global threat, which highlights the need to transform services for Indigenous people using approaches driven by communities and focused on their strengths.
Competing interests
Acknowledgements
References
- Kelly R, Davies SC. Tackling antimicrobial resistance globally. Med J Aust 2017; 207: 371-373.
- Tong S, McDonald MI, Holt DC, Currie BJ. Global implications of the emergence of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Indigenous populations. Clin Infect Dis 2008; 46: 1871-1878.
- Macmorran E, Harch S, Athan E, et al. The rise of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: now the dominant cause of skin and soft tissue infection in Central Australia. Epidemiol Infect 2017; 145: 2817-2826.
- World Health Organization. Declaration of Alma-Ata: International Conference on Primary Health Care. Alma-Ata: WHO; 1978. http://www.who.int/publications/almaata_declaration_en.pdf (viewed Nov 2017).
- McDonald EL. Closing the Gap and Indigenous housing. Med J Aust 2011; 195: 652-653.
- Saethre E. Illness is a weapon: Indigenous identity and enduring afflictions. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press; 2013.