Citation metrics for appraising scientists: misuse, gaming and proper use

Jaime A Teixeira da Silva
Med J Aust 2020; 213 (5): . || doi: 10.5694/mja2.50738
Published online: 7 September 2020

To the Editor: In their recent article, Ioannidis and Boyack focused on the misuse of author‐ and journal‐based metrics.1 The “predatory and other easy journals” they allude to are becoming increasingly difficult to distinguish2 in a widening continuum of journal quality that is seeing some overlap between predatory journals and indexed (eg, in Web of Science, Scopus or PubMed) journals that are traditionally perceived to be of peer‐review quality and whose scholarly content has been editorially authenticated.3 This increasing overlap between predatory and indexed journals is accentuated by an increasing lack of reproducibility, often revealed through post‐publication peer review of indexed journals.4 Predatory journals may also seek scholarly validation by allowing citation of their papers to infiltrate supposedly reputable databases.5 However, the continued inability to identify such journals invalidates calls to ban such entities or to not cite papers from currently blacklisted predatory journals, as was recently suggested by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.6

  • Miki‐cho, Japan


Competing interests:

No relevant disclosures.

  • 1. Ioannidis JPA, Boyack KW. Citation metrics for appraising scientists: misuse, gaming and proper use. Med J Aust 2020; 212: 247–249.
  • 2. Grudniewicz A, Moher D, Cobey KD, et al. Predatory journals: no definition, no defence. Nature 2019; 576: 210–212.
  • 3. Cortegiani A, Ippolito M, Ingoglia G, et al. Inflated citations and metrics of journals discontinued from Scopus for publication concerns: the GhoS(t)copus Project. F1000 Res 2020; 9: 415.
  • 4. Eisner DA. Reproducibility of science: Fraud, impact factors and carelessness. J Mol Cell Cardiol 2018; 114: 364–368.
  • 5. Severin A, Low N. Readers beware! Predatory journals are infiltrating citation databases. Int J Public Health 2019; 64: 1123–1124.
  • 6. Teixeira da Silva JA. The ICMJE recommendations: challenges in fortifying publishing integrity. Irish J Med Sci 2020; [Epub ahead of print].
  • 7. Dobránszki J, Teixeira da Silva JA. Corrective factors for author‐ and journal‐based metrics impacted by citations to accommodate for retractions. Scientometrics 2019; 121: 387–398.
  • 8. Fister I Jr., Fister I, Perc M. Toward the discovery of citation cartels in citation networks. Front Physics 2016; 4: 49.
  • 9. Flatt JW, Blasimme A, Vayena E. Improving the measurement of scientific success by reporting a self‐citation index. Publications 2017; 5: 20.


remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.