Connect
MJA
MJA

Killing the messenger: should scientific journals be responsible for policing scientific fraud?

Ana Marušić and Matko Marušić
Med J Aust 2006; 184 (12): . || doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2006.tb00408.x
Published online: 19 June 2006

The responsibility lies with the scientific community

Since, both in importance and in time, health precedes disease, so we ought to consider first how health may be preserved, and then how one may best cure disease.


  • 1 School of Medicine, Zagreb University, Croatia.
  • 2 Croatian Medical Journal, Zagreb, Croatia.


Correspondence: marusica@mef.hr

Competing interests:

The Croatian Medical Journal is a member of the ICMJE.

  • 1. Gerber P. What can we learn from the Hwang and Sudbø affairs? Med J Aust 2006; 184: 632-635.
  • 2. Altman LK. For science’s gatekeepers, a credibility gap. New York Times 2006 2 May; The Doctor’s World: 1.
  • 3. Claxton LD. Scientific authorship. Part 1. A window into scientific fraud? Mutat Res 2005; 589: 17-30.
  • 4. Van Der Weyden MB. Preventing and processing research misconduct: a new Australian code for responsible research [editorial]. Med J Aust 2006; 184: 430-431. <MJA full text>
  • 5. Fiter K. At the frontier of biomedical publication: Chicago 2005. BMJ 2005; 331: 838-840.
  • 6. Katavi ´c V. Five-year report of Croatian Medical Journal’s Research Integrity Editor — policy, policing, or policing policy. Croat Med J 2006; 47: 220-227.
  • 7. Huth EJ, Case K. The URM: twenty-five years old. Science Editor 2004; 27: 17-21.
  • 8. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals: writing and editing for biomedical publication. 2006. Available at: http://www.icmje.org (accessed May 2006).
  • 9. Becker G. Crime and punishment: an economic approach. J Polit Econ 1968; 76: 169-217.
  • 10. Magnus JR, Polterovich VM, Danilov DL, Savvateev AV. Tolerance to cheating: an analysis across countries. J Econ Educ 2002; 33: 125-135.
  • 11. Brice J, Bligh J. Author misconduct: not just the editors’ responsibility. Med Educ 2005; 39: 83-89.
  • 12. Marušić M, Marušić A. Good editorial practice: editors as educators. Croat Med J 2001; 42: 113-120.

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.