Professional discourtesy to radiologists does not enhance patient care
In this issue of the Journal, Nuttall describes some interactions between radiologists and their colleagues which suggest professional discourtesy.1 We do not know the individual circumstances of these, but we do know that collaboration, communication and courtesy are critical aspects of professionalism that will help to promote the quality use of diagnostic imaging. The patient and all other professionals involved are direct beneficiaries of such good conduct.
The full article is accessible to AMA members and paid subscribers. Login to read more or purchase a subscription now.
Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.
- 1. Nuttall JL. Professional discretion, courtesy and plain good manners: an anecdotal and personal view. Med J Aust 2005; 183: 627-628.
- 2. Borgstede JP. It’s about the patients. J Am Coll Radiol 2005; 2: 555-556.
- 3. Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. The CanMEDS roles framework. Available at: http://rcpsc.medical.org/canmeds/index.php (accessed Oct 2005).
- 4. Continuing professional development for medical practitioners. A report on the project conducted by the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists on behalf of the Committee of Presidents of Medical Colleges. Available at: http://www.ranzcog.edu.au/leapframework/pdfs/CPDFrameworkFinalReport.pdf (accessed Oct 2005).
- 5. Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists. Quality Use of Diagnostic Imaging (QUDI) Program: a program focusing on quality in radiology in Australia. Available at: http://www.ranzcr.edu.au/qualityprograms/qudi/index.cfm (accessed Oct 2005).
None identified.