A new evidence‐based guideline for assessment and management of polycystic ovary syndrome
Authors: Helena J Teede, Robert J Norman and Rhonda M Garad
Published online: 1 April 2019
In reply
As a result of the evidence synthesis and the guideline, leading PCOS researchers and consumers identified the following priorities for PCOS research: biological origins, diagnosis accuracy, contemporary PCOS‐related genetics, prevalence across diverse population groups (with a focus on Indigenous people), economic and health impacts, psychological burden, effective translation and implementation approaches, infertility, pregnancy complications, perinatal outcomes, and follow‐up in children with PCOS. In addition, the robust evaluation framework underpinning the PCOS guideline provides implementation data to further guide research priorities.
We endorse calls for increased PCOS research funding to focus on gaps and priorities emerging from the evidence‐based guidelines. The successful international guideline development process has delivered a road map in which best practice research is characterised as consumer‐driven, global, collaborative, multidisciplinary and large scale, with outcomes that will drive equity, focus public policy, build health sector capacity and deliver effective research translation and impacts. It is time for research funding bodies to disincentivise competitive, small scale, monodisciplinary, siloed research, and to enable collaborative, impactful, strategic, prioritised research addressing clear gaps in areas of high disease burden, including PCOS.
Competing interests
We are co‐authors of the International Evidence‐based Guideline for the Assessment and Management of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome.
References
- Norman RJ, Teede HJ. A new evidence‐based guideline for assessment and management of polycystic ovary syndrome. Med J Aust 2018; 209: 299–300. https://www.mja.com.au/journal/2018/209/7/new-evidence-based-guideline-assessment-and-management-polycystic-ovary-syndrome
- Teede HJ, Misso ML, Costello MF, et al. Recommendations from the international evidence‐based guideline for the assessment and management of polycystic ovary syndrome. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2018; 89: 251–268.
Linked content
-
MJA Letter: A new evidence‐based guideline for assessment and management of polycystic ovary syndrome
-
MJA Editorial: A new evidence-based guideline for assessment and management of polycystic ovary syndrome
Forty Years in the Making: Reporting on the Co-Creation of a National Roadmap for Birthing on Country Services for the Best Start to Life
Res McCalman, Anneka J. Bowman, Roianne West, Kristie Watego, Jyai Allen, Claire Clack, Sue Kildea, Sue Kruske, Melanie Briggs, Cleone Wellington, Rebecca Coddington, Yu Gao, Isabella Garti, Sascha Kowalenko, Sarah Ireland, Catherine Austin, John D. Boffa, Marah Prior, Kelsie Kahl, Bettina Chaseling, Sarah Khaw, Emily Armstrong, Donna Hartz, Yvette Roe
Temporal Trends in Preterm Birth Associated With Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy in Victoria, Australia: A Population-Based Interrupted Time-Series Study
Melvin Marzan, Heng Jiang, Daniel Lorber Rolnik, Joanne M. Said, Lisa Hui
Linguistic Manoeuvres: Obstetric Violence Camouflages Harm and Loss of Consent From Birth
Liz Sutton, Harsha Ananthram, Rebecca Matthews
Linguistic Manoeuvres: Obstetric Violence Camouflages Harm and Loss of Consent From Birth
Bashi Kumar-Hazard, Andrew M. Bisits, Sharon L. Settecasse, Jenny Gamble, Hazel Keedle, Hannah G. Dahlen
Linguistic Manoeuvres: Obstetric Violence Camouflages Harm and Loss of Consent From Birth
Wendy Pollock, Alissa Fleming, Ensieh Fooladi, Joy Kloester, Anne Tremayne, Yasmin Zisin, Bethany Carr, Kym Davey, Suzanne Willey, Jenny Gamble
Getting on the Same Page: Why Australia Needs a National Maternity Early Warning System (MEWS) Chart
Briony A. Cutts, Lucy Bowyer, Nisha Khot, Sandra Lowe, Stefan C. Kane