Adding kindness at handover to improve our collegiality: the K-ISBAR tool
Authors: David J Brewster and Bruce P Waxman
Published online: 10 December 2018
Handing over with kindness will help us create a culture of respect and trust in the workplace
Much has been written recently about the mental health of the Australian medical workforce, with doctors being burned out, bullied, harassed and mentally unwell.1,2 Why are doctors so unkind to each other? What has happened to collegiality? While we are from different medical backgrounds, we are united in the belief that it is time for change; time for a united response from the Australian medical profession focusing on collegiality, using kindness and understanding as the catalyst and clinical handover as the opportunity.
Collegiality describes a work environment where responsibility and accountability are shared by colleagues, with mutual respect. Kindness gets its roots from the old English word “cynd”, meaning “nature, family and lineage”, hence kinship. Collegiality requires people to co-operate, be generous and treat colleagues with understanding. Recent discussions have highlighted the need for a kinder Australian health system which will help to improve the wellbeing of our colleagues and their patients.3
Medical practitioners often use ISBAR (Introduction, Situation, Background, Assessment and Recommendation) to guide clinical handover.4 This tool aims to improve patient safety by providing a systematic approach to patient handover.5 The focus is on the clinical content, rather than the manner in which the handover is delivered. We suggest a greater emphasis on kindness, trust and respect, with the aim of improving collegiality. Hence, a new acronym: “K-ISBAR”. At every handover, doctors can display kindness (utilising empathy and understanding) towards each other, which may slowly rebuild our collegiality.
We should all be more reflective in our behaviour towards our colleagues, putting ourselves in their shoes and modelling our language and behaviour on what we would expect to receive. How should an intensive care physician respond to a tired surgeon asking to admit a patient to an intensive care unit (ICU) already at capacity?
We have all been guilty of uttering critical colloquialisms in the workplace that resist positive interdisciplinary relationships. Unfortunately, our apprentice junior doctors adopt these expressions that promote lack of collegiality. Doctors learn to criticise and blame each other, rather than understand the differences we all face in providing the best care to our patients.
Constant negative commentary cannot create a positive workplace environment. Surgeons may say to their registrars “ICU is being unreasonable and won’t take our patient” and intensive care physicians mutter “that rude surgeon is too busy to come and talk to the family themselves”. There is rarely truth in any of these comments. Surely our profession, which prides itself on compassion for patients, can display more compassion towards each other. Junior doctors become too concerned to call colleagues to refer a patient because of fear of how they will respond. As a profession, we have become too judgemental of our peers.
Surgeons blame anaesthetists for the speed of turnovers during an operating list, while anaesthetists joke that surgeons operate too slowly. In a landscape where we need to build trust among each other, how does this commentary and innuendo help? A divisive workplace does not engender collegiality and support. Collegiality is crucial to our profession and instrumental in allowing us to perform efficiently, excel in patient care and be perceived as kind, cohesive and compassionate by our patients.
Working in the emergency department (ED) can be draining. A full waiting room, sick patients without a clear diagnosis, anxious parents and patients; the list of stressors must seem endless. ED staff are constantly judged on their standard of care and are expected to be forever kind and compassionate. General practitioners do not have the luxury of point-of-care investigations and working into the evening. They are constantly waiting for results and opinions. And yet, these two disciplines must communicate effectively. This cannot happen if they speak ill of each other and fail to respect the work done on the other side of their telephone.
Changing negative culture requires a focal point and should start at handover. A kind handover needs to occur at all points throughout the patient’s time in hospital, between the GP and ED staff, physicians and surgeons, and finally within handover back to the GP. This kind handover can follow the structured clinical framework of ISBAR, while acknowledging the assistance of the receiving practitioner and being thankful for their ongoing care. Mistakes in diagnosis and treatment can be discussed openly without fear of prejudice or criticism from the receiving practitioner, as should requests for procedures. Indeed, humility and insight are important adjuncts to acts of kindness.
So, what do acts of kindness look like at handover? They can be as simple as saying thank you. A surgeon can thank an intensive care physician for making a bed available for their patient in the ICU; the intensive care physician can reply in kind by thanking the surgeon for talking to the patient’s family.
Kindness can be a compliment, acknowledging the work of the referring practitioner and the potential barriers they have faced in helping you. A surgeon can say to the doctor in the ED, “I really appreciated you organising the cardiologist to review the patient when you were so busy. Thank you.”
Kindness can be how we use our body language. A genuine smile goes a long way and can ease the anxiety of your colleague during handover, especially when your colleague may feel the referral has been delayed or their initial treatment has not been helpful. Kindness can be acts of thoughtfulness and generosity, such as an intensive care physician asking a surgeon after a tough night in theatre if they would like a cup of tea.
Throughout our medical careers, we should never shy away from dealing with each other in a kind and compassionate way. We challenge all Australian doctors to now consciously hand over with kindness. It may help us create the culture of respect and trust required in our workplace. Reflect on your own behaviour and be kind to your colleagues. Use K-ISBAR, to improve collegiality with kindness as the catalyst and clinical handover as the tool.
Competing interests
No relevant disclosures.
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr Malcolm Clark for his contribution to an earlier draft of this article.
References
- beyondblue. National Mental Health Survey of Doctors and Medical Students. October 2013. https://www.beyondblue.org.au/docs/default-source/research-project-files/bl1132-report---nmhdmss-full-report_web (viewed Oct 2018).
- Crebbin W, Campbell G, Hillis DA, et al. Prevalence of bullying, discrimination and sexual harassment in surgery in Australasia. ANZ J Surg 2015; 85: 905-909.
- Crock C. Patient, staff safety and wellbeing: time for kindness. MJA InSight 2017; 11 Sept. https://www.doctorportal.com.au/mjainsight/2017/35/patient-staff-safety-and-wellbeing-time-for-kindness/ (viewed Oct 2018).
- Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. The OSSIE guide to clinical handover improvement. Sydney: ACSQHC, 2010. https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/ossie.pdf (viewed Oct 2018).
- Arora VM, Johnson JK, Meltzer DO, Humphrey HJ. A theoretical framework and competency-based approach to improving handoffs. Qual Saf Health Care 2008; 17: 11-14.
Linked content
-
MJA Letter: Adding kindness at handover to improve our collegiality: the K‐ISBAR tool
-
MJA Letter: Adding kindness at handover to improve our collegiality: the K‐ISBAR tool
-
MJA Letter: In reply
Provenance: Not commissioned; not externally peer reviewed.
Getting on the Same Page: Why Australia Needs a National Maternity Early Warning System (MEWS) Chart
Briony A. Cutts, Lucy Bowyer, Nisha Khot, Sandra Lowe, Stefan C. Kane
Data for Equity: Can Linked Administrative Data Inform Pathways to More Equitable Child Health?
Sarah Gray, Shuaijun Guo, Meredith O'Connor, Elodie O'Connor, Katrina Williams, Hannah Badland, Susan Woolfenden, Josie Dickerson, Gerry Redmond, Marnie Downes, Sharon R. Goldfeld
Specialty College Selection: Why Change is Critical to Support a Future Rural Workforce
Matthew R. McGrail, Jenny May AM, Katherine Logan
The number of cancer‐related deaths that could be attributable to spatial disparities in survival in Australia, 2010–2019: a retrospective population‐based cohort study
Charlotte K Bainomugisa, Jessica Cameron, Paramita Dasgupta, Peter Baade
Differentiated and simplified oral HIV pre‐exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) models hold the key to virtually eliminating HIV transmission in Australia by 2030
Tyson Arapali, Sarah Warzywoda, Anthony K J Smith, Curtis Chan, Timothy R Broady, Erin Sullivan, Catherine MacPhail, Mohamed A Hammoud, Alexander Dowell‐Day, Benjamin R Bavinton
Non‐technical errors associated with deaths in surgical care, Australia, 2012–2019, by surgical specialty (Australian and New Zealand Audit of Surgical Mortality): a retrospective cohort study
Jesse Ey, Victoria Kollias, Octavia Lee, Kelly Hou, Matheesha Herath, John B North, Ellie Treloar, Suzanne Edwards, Martin Bruening, Adam J Wells, Guy J Maddern