Hepatitis C in Australia — a role for general practitioners?
Authors: Mieke L van Driel, David Lim and Paul J Clark
Published online: 17 July 2017
The availability of new antiviral agents opens the way for increasing GP involvement in the management of hepatitis C
The availability of new antiviral agents opens the way for increasing GP involvement in the management of hepatitis C
The new direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections became available on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme in March 2016. In September 2016, already over 10% of the estimated 230 500 Australians with chronic HCV infection had been treated.1 While such rapid uptake was unanticipated, it may represent the low-hanging fruit of the HCV epidemic: patients already enlisted in tertiary clinics waiting for treatment. From an epidemiological perspective, the remaining untreated patients may fall under the radar of tertiary-based clinics. If Australia is to capitalise on the opportunities of universal access to DAA therapies, it will require the concerted efforts of general practitioners to improve rates of diagnosis, assessment, treatment and follow-up in the community.
HCV infection is common in people who inject drugs (up to 50%) and prisoners (about 30%).2 Although the overall rate of HCV diagnosis has declined over the past decade, it has increased in the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander population to fourfold the rate in the non-Indigenous population.2 Many of these at-risk groups face barriers in engaging with tertiary health services, and coordinating their complex care needs, including HCV treatment, will need to be undertaken in the community.
Although preventing new infections (eg, through needle exchange programs and proactive case finding) is important, reducing prevalence by treating people living with HCV infection before they develop progressive liver disease is key to curbing the pending epidemic of liver failure and hepatocellular carcinoma. Until recently, this was problematical because of long treatment duration, disappointing viral clearance rates and limited access. Only a small proportion of patients diagnosed with HCV infection had ever received treatment, and only half of those were cured.2 The recent listing of DAAs on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme authorises GPs to prescribe DAAs either in consultation with specialists or independently once experienced.3,4 This is unique and is anticipated to increase access to treatment and improve health outcomes at a population level.
Access to treatment through general practice
GP involvement in delivering HCV treatment is a growing trend, with an increase from 4% to 19% in GP-initiated treatments between March and September 2016.1 Internationally, trials of different HCV treatment models support the efficacy of community-based treatments, generally targeting at-risk population groups.5 These models involve HCV clinics in opiate substitution or needle exchange programs, and outreach HCV prison programs.6 Telehealth is used to up-skill practitioners in underserved areas7 or facilitate patient–specialist interaction.8 The Western Australian nurse-led program facilitates access in remote communities, but more involvement of GPs has been suggested.9 The Queensland Injectors Health Network offers HCV treatment through their bulk-billing GP services to patients with chronic HCV infection, injection drug users or non-users.10 The Beacon model brings specialists into the general practice clinic, allowing patients to stay in the community and GPs to learn how to manage them more effectively through direct interactions with visiting physicians.11 This model was developed for complex diabetes care but has been expanded to the management of patients with HCV infection.
Obstacles and opportunities
To reduce the incidence of HCV infection, targeted measures in high risk and vulnerable groups are required, with a multipronged approach using different models. The vast majority of patients living with HCV infection are not actively injecting drugs, and may not have used drugs for decades. They live in the community and may suffer the stigma of HCV, posing a barrier to diagnosis and treatment.12 Embedding HCV management in general practice can help to identify patients with HCV infection (and also those with undiagnosed cirrhosis), facilitate treatment initiation and improve treatment adherence. Protocols for work-up and treatment monitoring,13 as well as tools for assessing interactions with other drugs already exist, training courses for GPs are held across the country, and qualitative interviews with Australian GPs reported satisfaction with the initiation training and willingness to engage with HCV management.14
Continuity of GP care creates further opportunities to monitor the long term effectiveness and safety of DAAs. More importantly, the whole person approach in general practice is fundamental to managing frequent comorbidities, such as mental health, chronic diseases and concomitant misuse of alcohol or other drugs. DAAs are costly, typically about $60 000–$90 000 per patient; it is therefore imperative that treatment is targeted and monitored well.
Partnerships across primary, secondary and tertiary care draw on the expertise of each partner to meet complex care needs and develop trusting long term relationships. Tackling HCV infection may lead the way for further innovations involving GP–specialist partnerships that bridge the existing divides to improve patient outcomes at an affordable price to society.
Competing interests
No relevant disclosures.
References
- The Kirby Institute. Initiations of new treatment for chronic hepatitis C during March to September 2016. Monitoring hepatitis C treatment uptake in Australia 2017; Issue 6, February, 2017. Sydney: The Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales Sydney. https://kirby.unsw.edu.au/sites/default/files/kirby/report/Monitoring-hep-C-treatment-uptake-in-Australia_Iss6-FEB17.pdf (accessed May 2017).
- The Kirby Institute. HIV, viral hepatitis and sexually transmissible infections in Australia. Annual surveillance report 2016. Sydney: Kirby Institute, 2016. https://kirby.unsw.edu.au/sites/default/files/kirby/report/SERP_2016-Annual-Surveillance-Report_UPD170116.pdf (accessed May 2017).
- Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme. General statement for drugs for the treatment of hepatitis C. http://www.pbs.gov.au/info/healthpro/explanatory-notes/general-statement-hep-c (accessed May 2017).
- Thompson AJV. Australian recommendations for the management of hepatitis C virus infection: a consensus statement. Med J Aust 2016; 204: 268-272.
- Wade AJ, Veronese V, Hellard ME, Doyle JS. A systematic review of community based hepatitis C treatment. BMC Infect Dis 2016; 16: 202.
- Mina MM, Clark PJ, Beasley HM, et al. Enhancing hepatitis C treatment in the custodial setting: a national roadmap. Med J Aust 2014; 200: 15-16.
- Arora S, Kalishman S, Thornton K, et al. Expanding access to HCV treatment – Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) Project: disruptive innovation in specialty care. Hepatology 2010; 52: 1124-1133.
- Keogh K, Clark P, Valery PC, et al. Use of telehealth to treat and manage chronic viral hepatitis in regional Queensland. J Telemed Telecare 2016; 22: 459-464.
- Lobo R, Mascarenhas L, Worthington D, et al. Evaluation of the regional nurse-supported hepatitis C shared care program in Western Australia: a mixed methods study. BMC Health Serv Res 2015; 15: 399.
- Queensland Injectors Health Network. Hepatitis C Treatment and Management Program. https://www.quihn.org/hepatitis-c-treatment-and-management-program (accessed May 2017).
- Jackson C, Askew D. Is there a polyclinic alternative acceptable to general practice? The ‘Beacon’ practice model. Br J Gen Pract 2008; 58: 733.
- Hepworth J, Bain T, van Driel M. Hepatitis C, mental health and equity of access to antiviral therapy: a systematic narrative review. Int J Equity Health 2013; 12: 92.
- Hepatitis C Virus Infection Consensus Statement Working Group. Australian recommendations for the management of hepatitis C virus infection: a consensus statement (January 2017). Melbourne: Gastroenterological Society of Australia, 2017. https://www.asid.net.au/documents/item/1208 (accessed May 2017).
- Hopwood M, Treloar C. Under the watchful eye of ‘a benevolent dictator’. Aust Fam Physician 2013; 42: 900-903.
Linked content
-
MJA InSight: Hepatitis C: the shift to general practice
Provenance: Commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Getting on the Same Page: Why Australia Needs a National Maternity Early Warning System (MEWS) Chart
Briony A. Cutts, Lucy Bowyer, Nisha Khot, Sandra Lowe, Stefan C. Kane
Data for Equity: Can Linked Administrative Data Inform Pathways to More Equitable Child Health?
Sarah Gray, Shuaijun Guo, Meredith O'Connor, Elodie O'Connor, Katrina Williams, Hannah Badland, Susan Woolfenden, Josie Dickerson, Gerry Redmond, Marnie Downes, Sharon R. Goldfeld
Specialty College Selection: Why Change is Critical to Support a Future Rural Workforce
Matthew R. McGrail, Jenny May AM, Katherine Logan
The number of cancer‐related deaths that could be attributable to spatial disparities in survival in Australia, 2010–2019: a retrospective population‐based cohort study
Charlotte K Bainomugisa, Jessica Cameron, Paramita Dasgupta, Peter Baade
Differentiated and simplified oral HIV pre‐exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) models hold the key to virtually eliminating HIV transmission in Australia by 2030
Tyson Arapali, Sarah Warzywoda, Anthony K J Smith, Curtis Chan, Timothy R Broady, Erin Sullivan, Catherine MacPhail, Mohamed A Hammoud, Alexander Dowell‐Day, Benjamin R Bavinton
Non‐technical errors associated with deaths in surgical care, Australia, 2012–2019, by surgical specialty (Australian and New Zealand Audit of Surgical Mortality): a retrospective cohort study
Jesse Ey, Victoria Kollias, Octavia Lee, Kelly Hou, Matheesha Herath, John B North, Ellie Treloar, Suzanne Edwards, Martin Bruening, Adam J Wells, Guy J Maddern