Fielke points out the need for further research in the area of patient safety and quality improvement in primary care. We certainly agree with this. The aim of our article1 was to highlight the premature defunding of capacity-building initiatives in primary care in terms of completing the successful development of a sustainable research workforce in general practice. The reasons why this is important for the health of Australians are described briefly in our article, as are some of the areas in which there are evidence gaps, with a particular focus on clinical problems. There was no intent for this to be a comprehensive list of the areas that require research specific to general practice and primary care, and there are substantial, important evidence gaps across a range of other areas. Research to support patient safety and quality improvement is certainly required. Other areas that also need research attention include, but are not limited to, implementation research to deal with evidence–practice gaps;2 workforce issues and improved access to primary care;3,4 integration of general practice, allied health, pharmacy and other disciplines to improve patient care;4 models of service delivery, including the imminent trials of the “medical home” concept; and medical and other health professional education in relation to general practice and primary care. The challenge for all of us who care about optimising primary health care for Australians is to use every possible avenue to strategically and effectively lobby the necessary range of government and other agencies so that the resources to address the diverse evidence needs of primary care are met into the future.
Publication of your online response is subject to the Medical Journal of Australia's editorial discretion. You will be notified by email within five working days should your response be accepted.