Volume 195 - Issue 8
Should more Australian doctors be salaried than paid by fee-for-service?
Author: Peter C Arnold
Med J Aust 2011; 195 (8): 452-453. || doi: 10.5694/mja11.11128
Published online: 17 October 2011
Published online: 17 October 2011
To the Editor: I would have thought that, in 2011, any debate pitting fee-for-service against salary models of remuneration was both stale and futile. These debates, such as the one entered into by Peat1 and Travis,2 have been around since Bismarck introduced health insurance for workers in Germany.
Surely we have come to realise, after more than a century of varied health insurance schemes and health services around the world, that it is a matter of horses for courses. A single payment system, whatever it is, will be inappropriate if applied universally in any country. There is a place for fee-for-service delivery, accompanied by insurance; there is a place for salaried service; and there is even (heresy for some!) a place for that form of salary called “capitation”.
Each system has its merits and its faults, which have been discussed ad nauseam by health economists too numerous to refer to (two publications serve as examples3,4); there is nothing new under the sun. Debates such as this generalise the behaviour of a few miscreants to all salaried or fee-for-service practitioners. This is clearly unfair to both groups.
Australia is fortunate that, back in the 1970s, our profession was able to stave off a Canadian-style, single-payer system. Our graduates can choose their method of remuneration — and, however they have been paid, we have distinguished colleagues who have achieved much and, regrettably, a few rogues. In the latter respect, we are no different from any other profession or trade.
Why not abandon the ideologies underlying both sides of the debate, face these facts and have both systems in place, where each is appropriate, rather than trying to apply a single solution everywhere? I am reminded of the wisdom of Anthony Ashley Cooper, third Earl of Shaftesbury; “The most ingenious way of becoming foolish is by a System”.5
Competing interests
No relevant disclosures.
References
- Peat BB. Should more Australian doctors be salaried than paid by fee-for-service? — Yes. Med J Aust 2011; 195: 256. doi: 10.5694/mja11.10898. 0_CBBBJDHJ
- Travis DG. Should more Australian doctors be salaried than paid by fee-for-service? — No. Med J Aust 2011; 195: 257. doi: 10.5694/mja11.10878. 0_CBBFAIFH
- Glaser WA. Paying the doctor: systems of remuneration and their effects. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1970. 0_CBBBIEFF
- Ginzberg E. Men, money and medicine. New York: Columbia University Press, 1970. 0_CBBCBDHF
- Ashley Cooper A. Characteristicks of men, manners, opinions, times. Vol 1. 1711. 0_i1142869