Although the risk from medical radiation is small, we should not become complacent
The full article is accessible to AMA members and paid subscribers. Login to read more or purchase a subscription now.
Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.
- Division of Oncology, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Herston, QLD.
Correspondence:
- 1. Berrington de González A, Darby S. Risk of cancer from diagnostic x-rays: estimates for the UK and 14 other countries. Lancet 2004; 363: 345-351.
- 2. Brenner DJ, Doll R, Goodhead DT, et al. Cancer risks attributable to low doses of ionizing radiation: assessing what we really know. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003; 100: 13761-13766.
- 3. International Commission on Radiological Protection. Managing patient dose in computed tomography. Ann ICRP 2000; 30(4). (ICRP Publication 87.)
- 4. International Commission on Radiological Protection. 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Ann ICRP 1991; 21(1-3). (ICRP Publication 60.)
- 5. Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists. Imaging guidelines. 4th ed. Sydney: RANZCR, 2001.
- 6. Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency. Diagnostic and interventional radiology. Radiation Protection Series. (Draft to be available later this year at www.arpansa.gov.au.)
- 7. Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists. Accreditation standards for diagnostic and interventional radiology. RANZCR, 2004. Available at: www.ranzcr.edu.au/open/q&aprogram/Std6-2.pdf (accessed Apr 2004).
Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.