In reply: Low-molecular-weight heparins and heparinoids

John W Eikelboom and Graeme J Hankey
Med J Aust 2003; 178 (8): . || doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2003.tb05270.x
Published online: 21 April 2003

In reply: Walters and Graham question the role of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) as a replacement for unfractionated heparin during pregnancy, and cite the lack of randomised comparisons to support their view that the standard initial treatment for pulmonary embolism during pregnancy remains intravenous unfractionated heparin. We do not deny the lack of clinical trials of LMWH in pregnancy; we were simply referring to the increased use of LMWH.1,2

  • John W Eikelboom
  • Graeme J Hankey



remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.