Please login with your free MJA account to view this article in full
Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.
- 1 University of New England, Armidale, NSW
- 2 Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW
- 3 Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS
- 4 University Centre for Rural Health, Lismore, NSW
We thank the NSW Office of Environment and Heritage for installing an air pollution monitoring station in Armidale and assisting with the installation of PurpleAir units (for checking and calibration) on the roof of the monitoring station, and the Armidale Regional Council for purchasing and installing further PurpleAir units.
No relevant disclosures.
- 1. European Environment Agency. Air quality in Europe: 2020 report (EEA report no. 09/2020). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2020. https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/air‐quality‐in‐europe‐2020‐report (viewed Apr 2021).
- 2. The Lancet. Ambient particulate matter pollution: Level 4 risk. In: Global Burden of Disease (GBD) cause and risk summaries (2019 data). Lancet 2020; 396: S228–S230. https://www.thelancet.com/pb‐assets/Lancet/gbd/summaries/risks/ambient‐particulate‐matter‐pollution.pdf (viewed Apr 2021)
- 3. The Lancet. Ambient ozone pollution: Level 3 risk. In: Global Burden of Disease (GBD) cause and risk summaries (2019 data). Lancet 2020; 396: S232–S233. https://www.thelancet.com/pb‐assets/Lancet/gbd/summaries/risks/ambient‐ozone‐pollution.pdf (viewed Apr 2021).
- 4. Broome RA, Powell J, Cope ME, Morgan GG. The mortality effect of PM2.5 sources in the Greater Metropolitan Region of Sydney, Australia. Environ Int 2020; 137: 105429.
- 5. Chang LTC, Scorgie Y, Duc HN, et al. Major source contributions to ambient PM2.5 and exposures within the New South Wales Greater Metropolitan Region. Atmosphere 2019; 10: 138.
- 6. Department of Planning, NSW Clean Air Strategy 2021–30. Draft for consultation. Mar 2021. https://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/topics/air/clean‐air‐strategy/draft‐nsw‐clean‐air‐strategy‐public‐consultation (viewed Apr 2021).
- 7. Borchers‐Arriagada N, Palmer AJ, Bowman DMJS, et al. Health impacts of ambient biomass smoke in Tasmania, Australia. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020; 17: 3264.
- 8. Borchers Arriagada N, Palmer AJ, Bowman DMJS, et al. Unprecedented smoke‐related health burden associated with the 2019–20 bushfires in eastern Australia. Med J Aust 2020; 213: 282–283. https://www.mja.com.au/journal/2020/213/6/unprecedented‐smoke‐related‐health‐burden‐associated‐2019‐20‐bushfires‐eastern
- 9. Robinson DL. Accurate, low cost PM2.5 measurements demonstrate the large spatial variation in wood smoke pollution in regional Australia and improve modeling and estimates of health costs. Atmosphere 2020; 11: 856.
- 10. Office of Environment and Heritage (NSW). NSW annual air quality statement 2018. June 2019. https://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/research‐and‐publications/publications‐search/nsw‐annual‐air‐quality‐statement‐2018 (viewed Apr 2021).
- 11. Riley ML, Kirkwood J, Jiang N, et al. Air quality monitoring in NSW: from long term trend monitoring to integrated urban services. Air Quality and Climate Change 2020; 54: 44–51.
- 12. Burnett R, Chen H, Szyszkowicz M, et al. Global estimates of mortality associated with long‐term exposure to outdoor fine particulate matter. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2018; 115: 9592–9597.
- 13. World Health Organization (Regional Office for Europe). Health risks of air pollution in Europe: HRAPIE project. Recommendations for concentration–response functions for cost–benefit analysis of particulate matter, ozone and nitrogen dioxide. Copenhagen: WHO, 2013. https://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/238956/Health_risks_air_pollution_HRAPIE_project.pdf (viewed Apr 2021).
- 14. Office of Best Practice Regulation (Australia). Best practice regulation guidance note. Value of statistical life. Aug 2019. https://www.pmc.gov.au/sites/default/files/publications/value‐of‐statistical‐life‐guidance‐note_0_0.pdf (viewed Apr 2021).
- 15. AECOM Australia. Economic appraisal of wood smoke control measures. Final report. Prepared for the Office of Environment and Heritage. June 2011. https://www.epa.nsw.gov.au/resources/air/WoodsmokeControlReport.pdf (viewed Apr 2021).
- 16. Wilton E. Review: particulate emissions from wood burners in New Zealand. Prepared for the National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research. Dec 2012. https://niwa.co.nz/sites/niwa.co.nz/files/WoodburnerReportFinal.pdf (viewed Apr 2021).
- 17. Australian Air Quality Group – Woodsmoke. Comparison of real‐life and AS/NZS 4013 lab test results of 35 wood heaters in NZ. July 2021. http://woodsmoke.3sc.net/files/AS-NZS_4013_vs_real_life_in_NZ.pdf (viewed July 2021).
- 18. Meyer CP, Luhar A, Gillett R, Keywood M. Measurement of real‐world PM10 emission factors and emission profiles from woodheaters by in situ source monitoring and atmospheric verification methods. Final Report of Clean Air Research Project 16 for Australian Commonwealth Department of the Environment Water Heritage and the Arts. May 2008. Archived: https://web.archive.org/web/20130430161853/http://environment.gov.au/atmosphere/airquality/publications/pubs/emission‐factor.pdf (viewed Apr 2021).
- 19. Phair R. Wood heaters: the cosy killers. VicDoc (AMA Victoria) [online], Sept 2020. https://vicdoc.partica.online/vicdoc/vicdoc‐september‐2020/features/wood‐heaters‐the‐cosy‐killers (viewed Apr 2021).
- 20. Hope Z. AMA fires up over wood heater buy‐back scheme. The Age (Melbourne), 13 June 2020. https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/ama‐fires‐up‐over‐wood‐heater‐buy‐back‐scheme‐20200611‐p5528k.html (viewed Apr 2021).
- 21. Regulatory Impact Solutions. Variation to the waste management policy (solid fuel heating). Policy impact assessment. Prepared for the Environment Protection Authority, Victoria. Nov 2017. https://www.epa.vic.gov.au/‐/media/epa/files/about-epa/what-we-do/piawastemanagementpolicysolidfuelheating.pdf (viewed Apr 2021).
- 22. Paton‐Walsh C, Rayner P, Simmons J, et al. A clean air plan for Sydney: an overview of the special issue on air quality in New South Wales. Atmosphere 2019; 10: 774.
- 23. Asthma Australia. Public would support a “phase‐out” of woodfire heaters [media release]. 18 Mar 2021. https://asthma.org.au/about‐us/media/public‐would‐support‐a‐phase‐out‐of‐woodfire‐heaters (viewed Apr 2021).
- 24. Johnston FH, Hanigan IC, Henderson SB, Morgan GG. Evaluation of interventions to reduce air pollution from biomass smoke on mortality in Launceston, Australia: retrospective analysis of daily mortality, 1994–2007. Br Med J 2013; 346: e8446.
- 25. Thurston GD, Kipen H, Annesi‐Maesano I, et al. A joint ERS/ATS policy statement: what constitutes an adverse health effect of air pollution? An analytical framework. Eur Respir J 2017; 49: 1600419.
- 26. Bourdrel T, Annesi‐Maesano I, Alahmad B, et al. The impact of outdoor air pollution on COVID‐19: a review of evidence from in vitro, animal, and human studies. Eur Resp Rev 2021; 30: 200242.
- 27. Australian Government. Economic response to the coronavirus: Home Builder. https://treasury.gov.au/sites/default/files/2021‐04/homebuilderfactsheet2704.pdf (viewed Apr 2021).


Abstract
Objectives: To estimate the annual burden of mortality and the associated health costs attributable to air pollution from wood heaters in Armidale.
Design: Health impact assessment (excess annual mortality and financial costs) based upon atmospheric PM2.5 measurements.
Setting: Armidale, a regional Australian city (population, 24 504) with high levels of air pollution in winter caused by domestic wood heaters, 1 May 2018 – 30 April 2019.
Main outcome measures: Estimated population exposure to PM2.5 from wood heaters; estimated numbers of premature deaths and years of life lost.
Results: Fourteen premature deaths (95% CI, 12–17 deaths) per year, corresponding to 210 (95% CI, 172–249) years of life lost, are attributable to long term exposure to wood heater PM2.5 pollution in Armidale. The estimated financial cost is $32.8 million (95% CI, $27.0–38.5 million), or $10 930 (95% CI, $9004–12 822) per wood heater per year.
Conclusions: The substantial mortality and financial cost attributable to wood heating in Armidale indicates that effective policies are needed to reduce wood heater pollution, including public education about the effects of wood smoke on health, subsidies that encourage residents to switch to less polluting home heating (perhaps as part of an economic recovery package), assistance for those affected by wood smoke from other people, and regulations that reduce wood heater use (eg, by not permitting new wood heaters and requiring existing units to be removed when houses are sold).