The Association Between Alignment to the Breast Cancer Optimal Care Pathways and Patient Survival in Victoria, Australia, 2012–2019: A Retrospective Population-Based Cohort Study
Authors: Brandon S. Hao, Juan C. Quiroz, Ian N. Olver, Claire M. Vajdic
Correspondence: brandon.hao@health.gov.au
Published online: 17 March 2026
Abstract
Objectives
To quantify the association between care alignment to the treatment step of the Cancer Council Victoria and Department of Health Victoria Optimal care pathways for people with breast cancer (OCP) (second edition) and survival.
Design
Retrospective population-based cohort study using the Victorian Cancer Registry and linked administrative health datasets.
Setting, Participants
Adult women diagnosed with invasive, unilateral breast cancer from 1 July 2012 to 31 December 2019 in Victoria, Australia.
Main Outcome Measures
Breast cancer-specific and overall survival for women whose care did or did not align to the treatment step of the OCP expressed as adjusted hazard ratios. Interaction between OCP alignment and cancer stage at diagnosis was also assessed.
Results
Of 29,591 eligible women, 17,152 (58.0%) were fully aligned, 7086 (23.9%) were partially aligned and 5353 (18.1%) were not aligned to the treatment step of the breast cancer OCP. Median follow-up was 1481days (interquartile range, 850–2210days). Adjusting for measured sociodemographic and clinical factors, OCP treatment alignment was associated with 23% (95% confidence interval [CI], 14%–31%) and 34% (95% CI, 29%–40%) lower risk of death from breast cancer and all causes, respectively, compared with non-alignment. By cancer stage, OCP alignment was significantly associated with 40% (95% CI, 27%–50%) and 30% (95% CI, 14%–42%) lower risk of breast cancer death for Stage II and III cancers, respectively, and 39% (95% CI, 26%–49%), 49% (95% CI, 42%–55%) and 33% (21%–44%) lower risk of all-cause death for Stage I, II and III cancers, respectively.
Conclusions
Risk of death was lower for women with breast cancer whose treatment aligned to the OCP compared with women whose treatment did not align. Our findings support the promotion and implementation of the breast cancer OCP.
Maximising Cancer Prevention and Early Detection in the Australian Cancer Plan: Where Are We Now and What Should Come Next?
Erin L. Symonds, Billie Bonevski, Richard Edwards, Nathan J. Harrison, Sana Ishaque, Nicole M. Rankin, Sibel Saya, Renee J. Smith, Carolyn Ee
An Australian Narrative Review of Adoptive Cellular Therapies in Malignancy: Expanding Indications, Referral Pathways and Safety Beyond Specialist Centres
Sarah Childs, David Ma, Anthony Rodrigues, Jennifer Massey, Rasha Cosman, Venessa Chin, Laila Girgis, James Lynam, Peter Lau, Barbara Withers, Anthony M. Joshua, Ben Tran, Jayesh Desai, Simon J. Harrison, John Moore, Jia Liu
Peritoneal Tuberculosis and Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia: A Case of Hickam's Dictum
Zayn Al-Timimi, Gem Chew, Martin Browne, Christiaan Mostert
From Ambition to Action: Closing Policy, Equity and Implementation Gaps in the Australian Cancer Plan's ‘Enhanced Consumer Experience’
Carla Thamm, Elise Button, Oluwaseyifunmi A. Agbejule, Reegan Knowles, Karen van Gorp, Mark B. Pinkham, Meinir Krishnasamy, Alexandra L. McCarthy, Raymond J. Chan
Sovereignty and Survival: Understanding Lung Cancer Outcomes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander People in Australia, a Case–Control Study
Alice R. T. Bergin, Luc te Marvelde, Roger L. Milne, Benjamin J. Solomon, Kris Ivanova, Peter Savas, Stephen J. Luen, Jay Hamann, Andrea Casey, Nicole Watt, Sue M. Evans, Gail Garvey, Sherene Loi
The Changing Indications for Adult Liver Transplantation in Australia: A Narrative Review
Fadak Mohammadi, Alan J. Wigg, Ken Liu, Simone I. Strasser