Voluntary euthanasia laws in Australia: are we really better off dead?
Author: Julia M Anaf
Published online: 1 May 2017
In her MJA article, Murphy poses the question “who are we talking about when we discuss voluntary euthanasia laws?” and presents two hypothetical scenarios.1
The South Australian Voluntary Euthanasia Bill 2016 defines an eligible person as a competent adult, subject to unbearable and hopeless suffering, with no impaired decision-making capacity, and who has lived in the state for no less than 6 months.2 The degree to which the suffering is unbearable is determined subjectively. A person’s suffering is considered hopeless if medical treatment cannot reduce or relieve the suffering to a level that is bearable to the person. The nature, availability and potential effectiveness of such treatment are determined objectively under the provisions of the Bill. As Murphy observes: “Every person’s story is different and we must be careful not to lump them together”.1 It is also true that aged care and mental health systems need much greater government investment. However, this alone will be unable to deal with the highly particularised needs of people whose lives have become unbearable despite the best medical or palliative care.
The 2016 Victorian inquiry into end of life choices stated: “Under the existing legal framework, Victorians with serious and incurable conditions and irremediable suffering are exposed to the possibility of a traumatic death. Some are driven to suicide.”3 The inquiry recommended a legal framework to allow assisted dying for the small number of people who seek help to end their suffering.
Such legal reform would surely provide great reassurance by ending the fear of enforced protracted suffering, which leads to pre-emptive and often violent suicides. Examples of the tragic circumstances triggering these actions were compellingly recounted by Coroner John Olle before the Victorian inquiry4 and alluded to in Murphy’s own account of reading “emotionally draining” case files of suicides in nursing homes. The legal status quo is an indictment of a civilised society.
Competing interests
References
- Murphy BJ. Voluntary euthanasia laws in Australia: are we really better off dead? Med J Aust 2016; 205: 254-255.
- Parliament of South Australia, House of Assembly. Voluntary Euthanasia Bill 2016. https://www.legislation.sa.gov.au/LZ/B/CURRENT/VOLUNTARY%20EUTHANASIA%20BILL%202016_HON%20STEPH%20KEY%20MP/B_AS%20INTRODUCED%20IN%20HA/VOLUNTARY%20EUTHANASIA%20BILL%202016.UN.PDF (accessed Feb 2017).
- Parliament of Victoria, Legislative Council, Legal and Social Issues Committee. Inquiry into end of life choices Final report, June 2016. http://www.parliament.vic.gov.au/images/stories/committees/SCLSI/EOL_Report/LSIC_58-05_Text_WEB.pdf (accessed Sept 2016).
- Olle J. Standing Committee on Legal and Social Issues: inquiry into end of life choices. 7 Oct 2015. http://www.parliament.vic.gov.au/images/stories/committees/SCLSI/ELC_Transcripts/SCLSI_-_Coroners_Court_-_FINAL_-_End-of-life_choices_7_October_2015.pdf (accessed Sept 2016).