Targeted health research funding — submit your ideas
Author: Anne Kelso
Published online: 7 November 2016
The National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) has created an online pathway for community and professional groups to submit their ideas for targeted health research funding.
The pathway allows the submission of proposals throughout the year. All eligible proposals will undergo review and prioritisation biannually, and recommendations will be provided to the NHMRC Research Committee for consideration.
Ideas should focus on research that has the potential to improve health outcomes for the community, reduce the burden of disease on the health system and Australian economy, and contribute to the global research effort.
The online pathway is part of NHMRC’s revised framework for identifying and prioritising targeted calls for research (TCRs). It is one of several channels for identifying possible TCRs under the new framework, which establishes a set of principles for priority-driven research and provides NHMRC with a mechanism to respond to emerging research needs.
A TCR is a one-time request for grant applications to address a specific health problem. They complement NHMRC’s existing suite of funding schemes by funding research in defined areas of need and when urgent research needs emerge.
A TCR can help stimulate research in a particular area of health and medical science that will benefit Australians. It could be the “tipping point” for a research breakthrough within a disease area — that small injection of targeted funding that will result in changed policy or practice, or a new discovery.
A TCR is typically allocated between $2.5 million and $5 million (depending on the type of research required) from a previously allocated research fund in the NHMRC Medical Research Endowment Account. The number of TCRs awarded each year depends on available funds.
More information on how to make a submission is available on the NHMRC website.
Getting on the Same Page: Why Australia Needs a National Maternity Early Warning System (MEWS) Chart
Briony A. Cutts, Lucy Bowyer, Nisha Khot, Sandra Lowe, Stefan C. Kane
Data for Equity: Can Linked Administrative Data Inform Pathways to More Equitable Child Health?
Sarah Gray, Shuaijun Guo, Meredith O'Connor, Elodie O'Connor, Katrina Williams, Hannah Badland, Susan Woolfenden, Josie Dickerson, Gerry Redmond, Marnie Downes, Sharon R. Goldfeld
Specialty College Selection: Why Change is Critical to Support a Future Rural Workforce
Matthew R. McGrail, Jenny May AM, Katherine Logan
The number of cancer‐related deaths that could be attributable to spatial disparities in survival in Australia, 2010–2019: a retrospective population‐based cohort study
Charlotte K Bainomugisa, Jessica Cameron, Paramita Dasgupta, Peter Baade
Differentiated and simplified oral HIV pre‐exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) models hold the key to virtually eliminating HIV transmission in Australia by 2030
Tyson Arapali, Sarah Warzywoda, Anthony K J Smith, Curtis Chan, Timothy R Broady, Erin Sullivan, Catherine MacPhail, Mohamed A Hammoud, Alexander Dowell‐Day, Benjamin R Bavinton
Non‐technical errors associated with deaths in surgical care, Australia, 2012–2019, by surgical specialty (Australian and New Zealand Audit of Surgical Mortality): a retrospective cohort study
Jesse Ey, Victoria Kollias, Octavia Lee, Kelly Hou, Matheesha Herath, John B North, Ellie Treloar, Suzanne Edwards, Martin Bruening, Adam J Wells, Guy J Maddern