Connect
MJA
MJA

First do no harm: a real need to deprescribe in older patients

Lisa Kouladjian, Timothy F Chen and Sarah N Hilmer
Med J Aust 2015; 202 (4): . || doi: 10.5694/mja14.01486
Published online: 2 March 2015

We enthusiastically welcome Scott and colleagues' article highlighting the real need to deprescribe in older patients;1 however, we would like to emphasise the role of validated tools and medication management reviews in deprescribing.


  • 1 University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW.
  • 2 Royal North Shore Hospital Sydney, NSW.



Competing interests:

No relevant disclosures.

  • 1. Scott IA, Anderson K, Freeman CR, Stowasser D. First do no harm: a real need to deprescibe in older patients. Med J Aust 2014; 201: 390-392. <MJA full text>
  • 2. Gnjidic D, Le Couteur DG, Kouladjian L, Hilmer SN. Deprescribing trials: methods to reduce polypharmacy and the impact on prescribing and clinical outcomes. Clin Geriatr Med 2012; 28: 237-253.
  • 3. Nishtala PS, Hilmer SN, McLachlan AJ, et al. Impact of residential medication management reviews on drug burden index in aged-care homes: a retrospective analysis. Drugs Aging 2009; 26: 677-686.
  • 4. Castelino RL, Hilmer SN, Bajorek BV, et al. Drug Burden Index and potentially inappropriate medications in community-dwelling older people: the impact of Home Medicines Review. Drugs Aging 2010; 27: 135-148.
  • 5. Carter SR, Moles R, White L, Chen TF. Exploring patients' motivation to participate in Australia's Home Medicines Review Program. Int J Clin Pharm 2012; 34: 658-666.

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.