Volume 201 - Issue 6

Getting mental health reform back on track: a leadership challenge for the new Australian Government

Authors:  Ian B Hickie, Patrick D McGorry and Helen Christensen

Med J Aust 2014; 201 (6): 323. || doi: 10.5694/mja14.00841
Published online: 15 September 2014
In reply: More work is needed, but there is sufficient evidence for action now

In reply: We welcome the opportunity to respond to Dignam's four key points.

First, the commitment in 2006 to a 5-year national mental health reform process gave birth to major funding and program initiatives, such as headspace and Medicare funding of psychological services. However, despite new funds in the 2011 Budget and the new National Mental Health Commission, clear national targets are still not agreed.1

Second, detailed evaluation of individual headspace services,2 as well as the national picture,3 indicates the extent to which these new service models are engaging with young people who are experiencing significant disability but are still in the early phases of illness. We agree that further systematic evaluation of pathways to care and their impacts on longer-term outcomes are required. However, systematic evaluation of early intervention services for those with psychotic disorders provides a basis for further action.4

Third, our view is that systematic suicide prevention is ready for deployment at scale and we offer further evidence to support this.5

Fourth, early intervention applies to clinical services provided early in the illness course. The peak age of onset for most major mental disorders is 12–25 years, hence the focus of headspace services on adolescence and early adulthood. During childhood, we support a focus on population-based strategies for primary prevention and expansion of early intervention services for anxiety, attention-deficit and autism-spectrum disorders.6


Authors


Competing interests


References