Volume 200 - Issue 1

Investigating iron deficiency anaemia

Authors:  William Sievert, Barbara A Leggett and Finlay A Macrae

Med J Aust 2014; 200 (1): 18-20. || doi: 10.5694/mja13.11201
Published online: 20 January 2014
In reply: We appreciate the interest of Bolin and Williams regarding our article.1 We agree that further investigation of iron deficiency anaemia was indicated in this patient, as her clinical presentation of severe, unexplained anaemia is clearly articulated in the Gastroenterological Society of Australia recommendations as requiring such diagnostic investigation, as stated in our article. Colonoscopy would have been the most appropriate investigation. Williams states ...

In reply: We appreciate the interest of Bolin and Williams regarding our article.1 We agree that further investigation of iron deficiency anaemia was indicated in this patient, as her clinical presentation of severe, unexplained anaemia is clearly articulated in the Gastroenterological Society of Australia recommendations as requiring such diagnostic investigation, as stated in our article. Colonoscopy would have been the most appropriate investigation. Williams states that all adults with significant iron deficiency anaemia should undergo endoscopy and colonoscopy. While no one would argue that the young woman did not have significant anaemia, there is no agreed definition of what is, or is not, significant. Given the common occurrence of iron deficiency in premenopausal women, prudent physicians and surgeons must consider the necessity for further investigation in each individual, given that dietary deficiency or menstrual loss are much more common than colorectal cancer in young women. This does not mean that young anaemic women should never undergo endoscopy or colonoscopy; it means that clinical judgement, including thorough history-taking, is required in the decision-making process.

While faecal occult blood testing has no role as a primary diagnostic test for gastrointestinal bleeding, it has a proven, evidence-based role in population screening for colorectal cancer. Williams notes the Gastroenterological Society recommendation for colonoscopy following a positive faecal occult blood test. In this situation, clinicians should consider each patient’s individual risk–benefit profile for colonoscopy before proceeding with the procedure.

In regard to the change in colorectal cancer incidence2 referred to by Bolin, we note that the absolute increase in the age range of the young woman in our article (20–24-year-olds) was low: 0.6 per 100 000 in 1987 to 1.5 per 100 000 in 2006.


Authors


Competing interests


References


More like this

Digestive system diseases Research 18 August 2026 Open Access

Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer With Liver-Only Metastases: A Retrospective Cohort Study Integrating Prospectively Collected Real-World Clinical and Molecular Data From an Australian National Database (2009–2024) to Guide Treatment Planning

Savio G. Barreto, Christos S. Karapetis, Shahid Ullah, Matthew Burge, Susan Caird, Angus Campbell, Azim Jalali, Ross Jennens, Muhammad A. Khattak, Belinda Lee, Stephanie H. Lim, Shehara Mendis, Louise Nott, Timothy J. Price, Jeremy D. Shapiro, Jeanne Tie, Javier Torres, Colin Williams, Rachel Wong, Vanessa Wong, Peter Gibbs

Clinical practice guidelines for hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance for people at high risk in Australia: summary of recommendations

Jacob George, Nicole L Allard, Stuart K Roberts, Leon A Adams, Jane Davies, Behzad Hajarizadeh, Jennifer H MacLachlan, Suzanne E Mahady, Rosalie Altus, Catherine Brown, David C Fry, Belinda Greenwood‐Smith, Natali Smud, Patricia C Valery, Nafisa Yussf, Kate Broun, Denise Campbell, Karen Canfell, Chelsea Carle Harrison, Victoria Freeman, Paul Grogan, Catherine Holliday, Suzanne Hughes, Anna Kelly, Cathelijne Kemenade, Claire Latumahina, Amanda McAtamney, Megan Varlow, Joachim Worthington, Susan Yuill, Eleonora Feletto