German doctors apologise for the crimes perpetrated by Nazi doctors
Author: Peter M Winterton
Published online: 2 September 2013
To the Editor: In his article on the German Medical Association’s apology for medical crimes under Nazism, Weisz states “One can but hope that it will be soon followed by an apology from the Austrian Medical Association”.1 Having been in Vienna on the 75th anniversary of the Anschluss (the annexation of Austria by Germany in March 1938), I would like to comment as to why I believe such an apology will be some time.
From the Anschluss until the end of the war, Austria ceased to exist. Thus, the Austrian Medical Association also ceased to exist during this period. At the time when the matter should have been addressed (1945–1955), Austria was ruled by four foreign powers (Britain, the United States, France and the Soviet Union). Therefore, the position it chose of having been a victim of Nazi aggression was one of convenience.
Austria today presupposes that the country made a clean start with the proclamation of the Second Republic in 1955. However, there is no doubt that the perpetrators of Nazi (including Austrian) medical ill deeds continued to hold positions of authority in the Second Republic. It took until the 60th anniversary of the Anschluss for the University of Vienna to acknowledge the Pernkopf affair,2 and then only after considerable international pressure.
I agree with Weisz that the 75th anniversary would have been a timely opportunity for the Austrian Medical Association to acknowledge that some of its former members had behaved in a shameful manner during the Nazi period. Only the passage of time will allow this difficult matter to be fully explored.
Competing interests
References
- Weisz G. German doctors apologise for the crimes perpetrated by Nazi doctors. Med J Aust 2013; 198: 162-163. 0_CHDIJIEI
- Pringle H. The dilemma of Pernkopf’s atlas. Science 2010; 329: 274-275. 0_i1142857
Research Priority Setting Is Not Research: A Call for Ethical Clarity in Australia
Bec Jenkinson, Gordon McGurk, Jonathan Quicke, Janelle Bowden, Nadine E. Foster
Organ Donation After Oral Ingestion of a Voluntary Assisted Dying Substance
Joanne Kantianis, Helen I. Opdam, Rohit L. D'Costa
Equity, Diversity and Inclusion From the Start: Reforming Australia's Research Infrastructure for Inclusive Participation
Danielle M. Muscat, Kirsten J. McCaffery, Heather L. Shepherd, Marguerite Tracy
A Match Made in Health Care: Can Ethics and Governance Better Support Impactful Implementation Research?
Natalie Taylor, Zhicheng Li, Cathelijne van Kemenade, Jackie Curtis, Patrick Bolton
Genomic Newborn Screening: Commodity or Public Good?
Christopher Gyngell, Sebastian Lunke, Danya Vears, Zornitza L. Stark
Implementing Voluntary-Assisted Dying in New South Wales Correctional Settings
Daniel Mogg, Michael H. Levy