Volume 199 - Issue 11

Publicly funded homebirth in Australia: a review of maternal and neonatal outcomes over 6 years

Author:  Donald M Clark

Med J Aust 2013; 199 (11): 742-743. || doi: 10.5694/mja13.10887
Published online: 16 December 2013
To the Editor: The recent article by Catling-Paull and colleagues1 documents the apparently very low perinatal mortality associated with state-funded homebirth, mostly among women in Western Australia. However, the 2007 triennial report of the WA Government Perinatal and Infant Mortality Committee (PIMC) stated that, for homebirth: The term perinatal mortality rate was 6.7 per 1000 total births, compared with a term perinatal mortality rate of 2.1 per 1000 total births in the ...

To the Editor: The recent article by Catling-Paull and colleagues1 documents the apparently very low perinatal mortality associated with state-funded homebirth, mostly among women in Western Australia.

However, the 2007 triennial report of the WA Government Perinatal and Infant Mortality Committee (PIMC) stated that, for homebirth:

This led the WA Government to undertake a review of homebirths in the state, which found that:

This review made a large number of recommendations to improve safety and regulation.

Nevertheless, the 2010 triennial PIMC report found that:

Catling-Paull et al1 state that the evidence surrounding the safety and benefits of homebirth remains contentious. I disagree — the benefits are contentious but the lack of safety is clear.


Author


Competing interests


References


More like this