A meta-analysis of “hospital in the home”

Gideon A Caplan
Med J Aust 2013; 198 (4): . || doi: 10.5694/mja12.11841
Published online: 4 March 2013

In reply: Dickson argues for exclusion of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) if treatments have changed, but treatments are constantly changing so, following this rule, meta-analysis would be impossible. Similarly, diagnosis has changed — stroke was a clinical diagnosis, then computed tomography was required, and now magnetic resonance imaging is needed. Equipoise is not a requirement for inclusion in a meta-analysis.

  • Gideon A Caplan1,2

  • 1 Post Acute Care Services, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW.
  • 2 Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW.


Competing interests:

I work in a hospital and a HITH unit.


remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.