Reflections
Health services administration Surgery
Volume 196 - Issue 1

“Blunderburg” revisited

Author:  Caroline M de Costa

Med J Aust 2012; 196 (1): 79. || doi: 10.5694/mja11.10966
Published online: 16 January 2012
Download PDF (63 KB)
Share: Share on Blue Sky Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share by email
Deadly healthcare.
James Dunbar, Prasuna Reddy, Stephen May. Brisbane: Australian Academic Press, 2011 (194 pp, $34.95). ISBN 9781921513756.

This is a compelling read. Dr Jayant Patel arrived at Queensland’s Bundaberg Hospital on April Fools’ Day 2003 and, in the words of former Federal Health Minister Michael Wooldridge, “walked into an environment tailor-made for disaster to occur”. In June 2010, he was sentenced to seven years’ imprisonment for manslaughter and grievous bodily harm involving four patients operated on in Bundaberg. An appeal was dismissed.

The authors of this well documented account are eminently qualified to tell the tale — Professor Dunbar teaches clinical governance and risk management at Flinders University in Adelaide, Professor Reddy is a health and organisational psychologist at Flinders and Stephen May is a former psychologist and journalist.

As they explain, Patel was far from being the only one at fault. The authors carefully examine the bureaucratic structures and attitudes in existence in Queensland Health, and the personal and professional failings of particular administrative staff at the Queensland Medical Board and the hospital that led to Patel — whose registration as a specialist surgeon was restricted in two US states — being appointed as director of surgery at Bundaberg. They find that the hospital was “fiscally driven”, and Patel’s ability to perform large numbers of operations benefited the budget and completely overrode concerns about patient outcomes.

The gulf between management and clinicians is neatly encapsulated in the story of an administrator telling a senior Bundaberg clinician concerned about Patel’s activities: “You have to understand that this is a business.” To which the doctor replied: “That’s where the problem is, you see. I think it’s a hospital.”

The efforts of this clinician and many other staff, patients and relatives to achieve justice are well described, as are the findings of the numerous formal inquiries and the details of Patel’s trial. Patel’s earlier life and medical training have been meticulously researched and the authors have attempted to give a balanced view, pointing out that many of the 1000 patients he operated on at Bundaberg benefited from his surgery. Had the proper checks and balances been in place, the negative outcomes might never have occurred.

Has the Queensland public health system learnt from the Patel case? Sadly, the authors conclude that it has not — their final sentence warns that a case like Patel’s “could be happening right now in your own modern overburdened healthcare system”.

Author

  • Caroline M de Costa1
  • 1. James Cook University School of Medicine, Cairns, QLD
View this article on Wiley Online Library

More like this

View more