Letters
Health services administration
Volume 196 - Issue 1

Prevalence and characteristics of complaint-prone doctors in private practice in Victoria

Authors:  Matt Vance, Michael Ward and David McKenzie

Med J Aust 2012; 196 (1): 38. || doi: 10.5694/mja11.10963
Published online: 16 January 2012
Download PDF (67 KB)
Share: Share on Blue Sky Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share by email

To the Editor: We noted with interest the recent publication by Bismark and colleagues1 about complaint-prone doctors in Victoria. This research makes a valuable contribution to the important task of identifying practitioners who are at high risk of delivering poor quality health care. Similar analysis of more than 32 000 complaints received in Queensland from 1992 to 2010 has been undertaken by the Health Quality and Complaints Commission (HQCC). A summary of this work, which was performed in collaboration with the Medical Board of Queensland, was presented recently.2

Between July 2006 and June 2010, only 5% of medical practitioners registered as practising in Queensland were the subject of a complaint in a given year. Medical practitioners with multiple complaints (four or more complaints over the period; 0.7% of all medical practitioners) have substantially more complaints (> 2 SD) than their peers (average number of complaints, 1.6).

An analysis of a subgroup of 117 doctors who were each the subject of multiple complaints revealed that they were more likely to be men, to have specialist rather than general registration, and to have an Australian rather than a non-Australian first qualification. Surgeons made up over 40% of this subgroup and were more likely to be the subject of a complaint than were other specialists. Further work is underway to clarify the level of complaints relative to the number of registered practitioners within each specialty.

Although there are differences in the samples and analytical methods used in the HQCC study compared with those used by Bismark et al, there are striking similarities in the central findings: a small proportion of doctors produce a disproportionate number of complaints, and past complaint history is predictive of future complaint risk.

Health complaints commissions in Australian states are working closely with the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency to explore remedial or preventive opportunities. This task needs to involve the health care industry and professional colleges, as these complaint-prone practitioners are often well known by their colleagues or employers but, equally often, not adequately managed. As there is evidence that unprofessional medical student behaviour predicts both unprofessional doctor behaviour and risk of disciplinary activity,3-4 medical schools should also be engaged in this task.

Authors

  • Matt Vance1
  • Michael Ward1
  • David McKenzie1
  • 1. Health Quality and Complaints Commission, Brisbane, QLD.

Correspondence: info@hqcc.qld.gov.au

Competing interests

No relevant disclosures.

References

View this article on Wiley Online Library

More like this

View more