Volume 195 - Issue 5
What does the future hold for general medicine?
Author: Joanna R Sutherland
Med J Aust 2011; 195 (5): 263. || doi: 10.5694/mja11.10848
Published online: 5 September 2011
Published online: 5 September 2011
To the Editor: I endorse the viewpoint expressed by Jenkins and colleagues.1 They refer to the dearth of hospital medical generalists, at a time of increasing numbers of elderly patients with multiple comorbidities. Nowhere is this lack of appropriate clinical skill to match demand so apparent as in our regional centres.
More often than not, junior doctors are responsible for older patients, and are required to manage disparate inputs from several medical and/or surgical subspecialists. Particularly for surgical patients with medical comorbidities, the junior resident medical officer (generally supervised by a visiting surgeon) is an inappropriate medical “case manager”. There is a desperate need in our regional centres to train and employ hospital-based generalists.
At the same time, there is a need to move away from the visiting medical officer (VMO) fee-for-service model, designed around the needs of private practitioners, and move towards a hospital-based specialist model, in which specialists are available, accessible and part of the fabric of our hospitals. While the VMO model has been useful, it is no longer appropriate as a basis for default clinical care arrangements. Only by moving towards a hospital-based generalist model, as suggested by Jenkins et al, will we see an improvement in hospital culture, junior doctor supervision and training, and, most importantly, medical governance for best patient care in our regional hospitals.
Competing interests
No relevant disclosures.
References
- Jenkins PF, Thompson CH, Macdonald AB. What does the future hold for general medicine? Med J Aust 2011; 195: 49-50. 0_DHDEIIBI