In reply: It is often hoped that clinical studies can be “all things to all people”. Yet, in reality, clinical registries are optimally designed to answer a limited number of questions such as use of therapies, current treatment, and reassurance (but not proof) of treatment effectiveness.
The full article is accessible to AMA
members and paid subscribers.
Login to MJA or subscribe now.
- 1 Flinders University, Adelaide, SA.
- 2 Geelong Hospital, Geelong, VIC.
- 3 Nambour General Hospital, Nambour, QLD.
- 4 Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, WA.
- 5 Sanofi–Aventis Australia, Sydney, NSW.
- 6 Concord Hospital, Sydney, NSW.
Correspondence: Derek.Chew@flinders.edu.au
- 1. Chew DP, Amerena JV, Coverdale SG, et al, on behalf of the ACACIA investigators. Invasive management and late clinical outcomes in contemporary Australian management of acute coronary syndromes: observations from the ACACIA registry. Med J Aust 2008; 188: 691-697. <eMJA full text> <MJA full text>
Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.