MJA policy on sponsored supplements
Author: Martin B Van Der Weyden
Published online: 18 February 2008
In reply: I welcome Dr Jureidini’s criticisms regarding the publication of the MJA supplement “Early intervention in youth mental health”.1
Dr Jureidini has two major concerns. First, a number of articles in the supplement are deemed to unilaterally advocate concepts arising from the ORYGEN–headspace program, with the suggestion that this exclusivity contravenes the MJA policy for publishing sponsored supplements. Second, he claims that the general framework of the ORYGEN–headspace program does not have the endorsement of professional bodies such as the Faculty of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists (RANZCP).
Eminent mental health experts reviewed the articles in the supplement and, interestingly, not one of these authorities raised the RANZCP’s misgivings. This could mean that propagation of the Faculty’s concerns in the psychiatry fraternity may be selective, or that the rationale for its position has not convinced psychiatrists at large.
Dr Jureidini’s other concern — that the supplement favoured the ORYGEN–headspace approach at the expense of other interventions, views or products — reflects the very essence of supplements. The fundamental purpose of publishing research or commentaries is to enter information into the publishing–evidence–integration cycle, wherein the dissemination of evidence or ideas is intended to promote change by influencing other researchers, health care professionals, the public and, ultimately, policymakers.
Indeed, the ORYGEN–headspace program must have influenced policymakers, as the federal government recently announced grants totalling $19 million to support the national roll-out of the headspace program, especially in rural communities.2
Even if the publication of the MJA supplement played little or no part in this political endorsement, I am content that it has, at least, fostered debate and may well play a part in improving mental health services for young Australians.
References
- Early intervention in youth mental health [supplement]. Med J Aust 2007; 187 (7 Suppl): S1-S70.<eMJA full text>
- Creswell A. $19m package makes hearty difference to headspace. The Australian 2008; 12-13 Jan: 18. 0_BABGICAF
Getting on the Same Page: Why Australia Needs a National Maternity Early Warning System (MEWS) Chart
Briony A. Cutts, Lucy Bowyer, Nisha Khot, Sandra Lowe, Stefan C. Kane
Data for Equity: Can Linked Administrative Data Inform Pathways to More Equitable Child Health?
Sarah Gray, Shuaijun Guo, Meredith O'Connor, Elodie O'Connor, Katrina Williams, Hannah Badland, Susan Woolfenden, Josie Dickerson, Gerry Redmond, Marnie Downes, Sharon R. Goldfeld
Specialty College Selection: Why Change is Critical to Support a Future Rural Workforce
Matthew R. McGrail, Jenny May AM, Katherine Logan
The number of cancer‐related deaths that could be attributable to spatial disparities in survival in Australia, 2010–2019: a retrospective population‐based cohort study
Charlotte K Bainomugisa, Jessica Cameron, Paramita Dasgupta, Peter Baade
Differentiated and simplified oral HIV pre‐exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) models hold the key to virtually eliminating HIV transmission in Australia by 2030
Tyson Arapali, Sarah Warzywoda, Anthony K J Smith, Curtis Chan, Timothy R Broady, Erin Sullivan, Catherine MacPhail, Mohamed A Hammoud, Alexander Dowell‐Day, Benjamin R Bavinton
Non‐technical errors associated with deaths in surgical care, Australia, 2012–2019, by surgical specialty (Australian and New Zealand Audit of Surgical Mortality): a retrospective cohort study
Jesse Ey, Victoria Kollias, Octavia Lee, Kelly Hou, Matheesha Herath, John B North, Ellie Treloar, Suzanne Edwards, Martin Bruening, Adam J Wells, Guy J Maddern