Entry tests for graduate medical programs: is it time to re-think?

Michele A Groves, Jill Gordon and Greg Ryan
Med J Aust 2007; 187 (4): . || doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2007.tb01228.x
Published online: 20 August 2007

In reply: The limitations of our study have been acknowledged, and we agree with Parker and colleagues that further research is needed. However, their proposition that selection scores may not be intended to predict relative performance in programs seems at odds with their recommendation to select principally on the basis of academic performance. If selection scores do not provide predictability, why bother establishing any criteria at all? Why not simply use a lottery system, as they have been claimed to be equally effective?1

  • Michele A Groves1
  • Jill Gordon2
  • Greg Ryan2

  • 1 School of Medicine, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD.
  • 2 University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW.



remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.