In the wake of hospital inquiries: impact on staff and safety

James A Dunbar, Prasuna Reddy, Bill Beresford, Wayne P Ramsey and Reginald S A Lord
Med J Aust 2007; 186 (6): . || doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2007.tb00920.x
Published online: 19 March 2007

In reply: We are grateful to Mooney for drawing our attention to the “missing chapter” of the Douglas Inquiry report, which came to light after we had submitted our article for publication. Open and fully public inquiries are necessary for all parties involved.1 To the best of our knowledge, the Douglas Inquiry is the most thorough review ever undertaken of clinical standards in an Australian hospital.2 It is difficult to know how other hospitals would have compared over the same period.3

  • James A Dunbar1
  • Prasuna Reddy2
  • Bill Beresford3
  • Wayne P Ramsey4
  • Reginald S A Lord5

  • 1 Greater Green Triangle University Department of Rural Health, Flinders and Deakin Universities, Warrnambool, VIC.
  • 2 School of Behavioural Science, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC.
  • 3 Central Queensland Health Service District, Rockhampton, QLD.
  • 4 ACT Health, Canberra, ACT.
  • 5 University of Western Sydney, Sydney, NSW.



remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.