In the wake of hospital inquiries: impact on staff and safety
Authors: James A Dunbar, Prasuna Reddy, Bill Beresford, Wayne P Ramsey and Reginald S A Lord
Published online: 19 March 2007
In reply: We are grateful to Mooney for drawing our attention to the “missing chapter” of the Douglas Inquiry report, which came to light after we had submitted our article for publication. Open and fully public inquiries are necessary for all parties involved.1 To the best of our knowledge, the Douglas Inquiry is the most thorough review ever undertaken of clinical standards in an Australian hospital.2 It is difficult to know how other hospitals would have compared over the same period.3
Our article concentrated on how these hospitals recovered, as organisations, to improve patient safety. We called for “open, honest, and timely investigation undertaken within the organisation”, which avoids prolonging the recovery that, paradoxically, can make hospitals less safe.4 In the United Kingdom, the General Medical Council enforces a national system that puts patient safety first and makes covering up for a poorly performing colleague an offence.5,6 It also requires Directors of Medical Services to act in patients’ best interests. Concerns about a colleague’s performance are handled locally, because experience has demonstrated that this works best for patients and doctors.
We would like to see the proposed national registration body for health professionals in Australia make reporting such concerns obligatory.
References
- Final report of the Queensland Public Hospitals Commission of Inquiry. (The Davies report.) November 2005. http://www.qphci.qld.gov.au (accessed Dec 2006).<eMJA full text>
- Douglas N, Robinson J, Fahy K. Inquiry into obstetric and gynaecological services at King Edward Memorial Hospital 1990–2000. Final report. Perth: Government of Western Australia, 2001. 0_CBBHEEGB
- McLean J, Walsh M. Lessons from the inquiry into obstetrics and gynaecology services at King Edward Memorial Hospital 1990–2000. Aust Health Rev 2003; 26: 12-23. 0_CBBHDDHD
- Dunbar JA, Reddy P, Beresford B, et al. In the wake of hospital inquiries: impact on staff and safety. Med J Aust 2007; 186: 80-83. 0_CBBHCGAI
- General Medical Council. Good medical practice. London: GMC, 2006. http://www.gmc-uk.org/guidance/good_medical_practice/ (accessed Dec 2006).
- National Patient Safety Agency. NPSA statement on review of arm’s length bodies. 22 Jul 2004. http://www.npsa.nhs.uk/display?contentld=3106 (accessed Dec 2006).
Getting on the Same Page: Why Australia Needs a National Maternity Early Warning System (MEWS) Chart
Briony A. Cutts, Lucy Bowyer, Nisha Khot, Sandra Lowe, Stefan C. Kane
Data for Equity: Can Linked Administrative Data Inform Pathways to More Equitable Child Health?
Sarah Gray, Shuaijun Guo, Meredith O'Connor, Elodie O'Connor, Katrina Williams, Hannah Badland, Susan Woolfenden, Josie Dickerson, Gerry Redmond, Marnie Downes, Sharon R. Goldfeld
Specialty College Selection: Why Change is Critical to Support a Future Rural Workforce
Matthew R. McGrail, Jenny May AM, Katherine Logan
The number of cancer‐related deaths that could be attributable to spatial disparities in survival in Australia, 2010–2019: a retrospective population‐based cohort study
Charlotte K Bainomugisa, Jessica Cameron, Paramita Dasgupta, Peter Baade
Differentiated and simplified oral HIV pre‐exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) models hold the key to virtually eliminating HIV transmission in Australia by 2030
Tyson Arapali, Sarah Warzywoda, Anthony K J Smith, Curtis Chan, Timothy R Broady, Erin Sullivan, Catherine MacPhail, Mohamed A Hammoud, Alexander Dowell‐Day, Benjamin R Bavinton
Non‐technical errors associated with deaths in surgical care, Australia, 2012–2019, by surgical specialty (Australian and New Zealand Audit of Surgical Mortality): a retrospective cohort study
Jesse Ey, Victoria Kollias, Octavia Lee, Kelly Hou, Matheesha Herath, John B North, Ellie Treloar, Suzanne Edwards, Martin Bruening, Adam J Wells, Guy J Maddern