In the wake of hospital inquiries: impact on staff and safety
Author: Geoffrey J Dobb
Published online: 19 March 2007
In reply: Mooney makes assertions in his letter and elsewhere1 that cannot go unchallenged.
He is wrong in stating that the “missing chapter” from the Douglas Inquiry report2 “was kept secret for 5 years because of intense lobbying of the state government by members of the medical profession”. To quote the then Minister for Health, “... sections of the [inquiry’s] report were withheld on advice from the Crown Solicitor, mainly for the protection of patients”.3 Detailed reasons for information provided to the inquiry being kept private were published in 2001.4
I stand by my statement that “I very much doubt there is anything in [the missing chapter] that would serve the public interest by releasing it now”. The report on the Douglas Inquiry made 237 recommendations. The reality is that Dr Bill Beresford, who stepped in as Acting Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of King Edward Memorial Hospital (KEMH), did an outstanding job in implementing the report’s recommendations and making a good but under-resourced hospital much better.
Mooney is also wrong to describe Michael Moodie as a whistleblower. He was the CEO of the hospital and accountable for the services it provided. The only person he would be blowing a whistle to was himself, if he failed to act. True, the problems stretched back over 10 years; many of the issues were highlighted in a report released in 1990.5 Among these were the findings that “King Edward is understaffed by 5.2 FTE [full-time equivalent] generalist obstetricians and gynaecologists” and “... the after hours cover is inadequate and potentially unsafe” (Vol. II, p152). I believe it was the failure to act by successive state governments and health ministers, who had the ultimate responsibility for provision of health services, that led to the problems at KEMH.
For at least a decade now, the need to collocate Western Australia’s tertiary obstetric services with adult tertiary services has been advocated, so the increasing proportion of mothers with significant comorbidities, including diabetes, heart disease and substance misuse, can have optimum access to services, including adult intensive care. While this principle appears to have been accepted,6 there has been no indication as yet of its implementation.
Mooney and the community can trust doctors; the lessons from the Douglas Inquiry have been learnt, and its recommendations implemented.
References
- Mooney G. Trust went missing with KEMH secrets. The West Australian 2007; 5 Jan: 16.<eMJA full text>
- Douglas N, Robinson J, Fahy K. Inquiry into obstetric and gynaecological services at King Edward Memorial Hospital 1990–2000. Final report. Perth: Government of Western Australia, 2001. 0_CBBCFBCC
- Gregory A. Call to reveal secret hospital probe details. The West Australian 2002; 1 Jun: 54. 0_CBBFCEEC
- Douglas N, Robinson J, Fahy K. Inquiry into obstetric and gynaecological services at King Edward Memorial Hospital. Inquiry hearings: ruling. 30 November 2000. Healthcover 2001; Feb–Mar: 55-58. 0_CBBFCGIJ
- Report of the Ministerial Task Force to review obstetric, neonatal and gynaecological services in Western Australia. Perth: Government of Western Australia, 1990. 0_CBBJGECD
- O’Leary C. Fong’s plan for super hospital revealed. The West Australian 2006; 31 May: 1. 0_CBBIFBFG