Connect
MJA
MJA

Birth centre trials are unreliable

Andrew F Pesce
Med J Aust 2006; 185 (7) || doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2006.tb00628.x
Published online: 2 October 2006

In reply: Fahy and Tracy highlight the lack of high-level evidence about the relative safety of different models of maternity care. But in criticising the Cochrane review, it is important not to “shoot the messenger”.

The full article is accessible to AMA
members and paid subscribers.
Login to MJA or subscribe now.


  • Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW.


Correspondence: apesce@bigpond.net.au

  • 1. Hodnett ED, Downe S, Edwards N, Walsh D. Home-like versus conventional institutional settings for birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005; (1): CD000012. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000012.pub2.
  • 2. Gottvall K, Grunewald C, 2Waldenstrom U. Safety of birth centre care: perinatal mortality over a 10-year period. BJOG 2004; 111: 71-78.

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.