Volume 182 - Issue 6

Near-drowning treated with therapeutic hypothermia

Authors:  Jonathan P Williamson and Stan Braude

Med J Aust 2005; 182 (6): 309-310. || doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2005.tb06712.x
Published online: 21 March 2005

In reply: We agree that our patient’s survival from the near-drowning incident was primarily attributable to the initial and subsequent supportive care. Clearly, the contribution of hypothermia to his survival cannot be quantified from one case.

However, previous studies have shown that the use of controlled hypothermia in comatose survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest improved survival with good outcome. 1,2 These studies did not focus on drowning victims — a study in this group would be extremely difficult — but had neurological recovery in patients with anoxic brain injury as principal outcome. In this sense, it can be argued that the aetiology of the brain anoxia is not in itself important.

The Amsterdam World Congress on Drowning in 2002 recommended the use of controlled hypothermia in the comatose near-drowned patient. 3 This is a relatively simple procedure (albeit labour intensive) and is becoming the standard of care in many hospitals for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. In these hospitals, its routine use in the near-drowned patient would not be difficult. Given the evidence so far accumulated in its favour, and the lack of adverse effects if undertaken correctly, it seems justified to seriously consider its use in the near-drowned patient.

We therefore argue that the ventilation and supportive care of our patient aided his physiological recovery, while the neurological recovery was at least partly due to the hypothermia.


Authors


References