The Profession – 90th Anniversary

Volume 181 - Issue 1

Mister or Doctor? What's in a name?

Authors:  Clair Whelan and Henry H Woo

Med J Aust 2004; 181 (1): 20. || doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2004.tb06151.x
Published online: 5 July 2004

The tradition of addressing surgeons as “Mister” or “Miss” rather than “Doctor” is firmly entrenched in English surgical practice. This tradition is generally thought to have had its origins in the days of the “barber-surgeons”, after the Company of Barbers united with the various guilds of surgeons in 1540.1 The blade-wielding skills of barbers had given them opportunities for surgical practice, and “surgeons” at that time seldom had formal qualifications. Whether the two professions united for financial reasons or to bolster their numbers after the Black Plague of the 14th century is unclear.2

By the beginning of the 18th century, physicians and a few surgeon members of the Great Company of Barbers and Surgeons had gained university qualifications.3 All other surgeons were, quite naturally, addressed as “Mister”.

With the separation of the surgeons from the Great Company of Barbers and Surgeons1 in 1745 and the establishment of the Royal College of Surgeons of London, the title “Mr” was retained and began to be seen as a label of status, as it marked the completion of formal examinations.

The strong influence of the Royal College of Surgeons of England in the formative years of the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons (RACS) led to the persistence of the term in Australia.

Anecdotally, the use of the term “Mr” appears to be losing favour, at least in New South Wales, and we sought to determine the prevalence of “Mr’s” among urologists in New South Wales and Victoria.

Methods

Practising urologists with workplace addresses listed as NSW or Victoria were identified from the List of Members 2003 booklet of the Urological Society of Australasia.3 Data were collected from the letterheads (or signatures on letters) of practising urologists and, if letters were not available, by contacting urologists’ secretaries by telephone. The level of membership and year of attainment were recorded from the booklet.


Authors


Competing interests


References