In reply: Treating phimosis

Paddy A Dewan
Med J Aust 2003; 178 (11): . || doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2003.tb05373.x
Published online: 2 June 2003

In reply: I thank Darby for his correction of the historical facts, and for raising for further discussion the ethics of circumcision. While I concur that removal of the prepuce for cosmetic reasons may not be in the interests of the child, we do need to allow for the parents' perceptions, and for their willingness and ability to care for the prepuce appropriately, if we refuse to perform a circumcision. While the risks from a well-cared-for prepuce are very low, the foreskin being retained does come with potential problems.

  • Paddy A Dewan



remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.