To the Editor: Advocating implementation of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines is one aspect of the current drive to provide quality healthcare across different centres.
The full article is accessible to AMA
members and paid subscribers.
Login to MJA or subscribe now.
Correspondence: dkyong@optusnet.com.au
- 1. Scott IA, Harper CM. Guideline-discordant care in acute myocardial infarction: predictors and outcomes. Med J Aust 2002; 177: 26-31. <eMJA full text>
- 2. Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Streptochinasi nell'Infarto Miocardico (GISSI). Effectiveness of intravenous thrombolytic treatment in acute myocardial infarction. Lancet 1986; 1: 397-402.
- 3. ISIS-3 (Third International Study of Infarct Survival) Collaborative Group. ISIS-3: a randomized comparison of streptokinase vs tissue plasminogen activator vs anistreplase and of aspirin plus heparin vs aspirin alone among 41 299 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction. Lancet 1992; 339: 753-770.
- 4. Krumholz HM, Murillo JE, Chen J, et al. Thrombolytic therapy for eligible elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction. JAMA 1997; 277: 1683-1688.
Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.