Volume 177 - Issue 1
Confidentiality
Authors: Peter C Arnold, Bernadette M Tobin, Steven R Leeder and Ernest R Somerville
Med J Aust 2002; 177 (1): 165. || doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2002.tb04648.x
Published online: 1 July 2002
Published online: 1 July 2002
To the Editor: Perhaps for reasons of space, Tobin et al, in their article on community versus individual benefit,1 have omitted an important public health justification for confidentiality. If patients are fearful that the doctor's obligation to notify the authorities could lead to a loss of privileges (in the case cited, a driver's licence), they may fail to attend for diagnosis and treatment. This understandable anxiety warrants a mention in this debate.
References
- Tobin MT, Leeder SR, Somerville ER. Community versus individual benefit. Med J Aust 2002; 176: 279-280. <eMJA full text>
Seven Vessel Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection and Concurrent Transient Global Amnesia After an Emotional Trigger
Michael J. Stewart, Tom R. Sutherland
Seven Vessel Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection and Concurrent Transient Global Amnesia After an Emotional Trigger
Virginia Barbour
Research Priority Setting Is Not Research: A Call for Ethical Clarity in Australia
Bec Jenkinson, Gordon McGurk, Jonathan Quicke, Janelle Bowden, Nadine E. Foster
Organ Donation After Oral Ingestion of a Voluntary Assisted Dying Substance
Joanne Kantianis, Helen I. Opdam, Rohit L. D'Costa
Equity, Diversity and Inclusion From the Start: Reforming Australia's Research Infrastructure for Inclusive Participation
Danielle M. Muscat, Kirsten J. McCaffery, Heather L. Shepherd, Marguerite Tracy
A Match Made in Health Care: Can Ethics and Governance Better Support Impactful Implementation Research?
Natalie Taylor, Zhicheng Li, Cathelijne van Kemenade, Jackie Curtis, Patrick Bolton